Reynolds v. Class et al
| Scotty G Reynolds |
| Chris Class and T Tschannen |
| 4:2022cv01020 |
| September 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| David D Noce |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE to the Court and Evidence Update by Petitioner Scotty G Reynolds (AFO) |
| Filing 9 Letter from Clerk sent to Petitioner Scotty G Reynolds re: Failure to file Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 11/14/2022. (KJS) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 9. Thu Nov 3 10:08:50 CDT 2022 (Shirley, Kelley)
|
| Notice from Clerk instructing Respondents Chris Class, T Tschannen to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 11/10/2022. (KJS) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Compel Discovery by Petitioner Scotty G Reynolds. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AFO) |
| Filing 7 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed with Amended Petition for Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Scotty G Reynolds. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AFO) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Petitioner Scotty G Reynolds. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AFO) Address Modified on 10/21/2022 (CMC). |
| Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Missouri Western; Case Number 2:22-cv-04137. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Case transferred in electronically. |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Sep 26 17:02:48 CDT 2022 (admin,) |
| Case electronically transferred to District of Eastern District of Missouri. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable David D. Noce. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Per Local Rule 12.01, attorneys who are not admitted to the Eastern District of Missouri do not need to apply for admission pro hac vice in order to practice on a case if they had already filed an entry of appearance before the case was transferred from another United States District Court. For more information, visit #attorney applications. (JBH) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JBH) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that this petition for a writ of habeas corpus is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for all further proceedings. Signed on 9/19/2022 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Scotty G Reynolds. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Scotty G Reynolds. (Attachments: #1 2241 Grounds (continued), #2 2241 Exhibits)(Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
