Ramirez v. River Cement Co.
| Benito Roberto Otero Ramirez |
| River Cement Co. doing business as Buzzi Unicem USA Inc. |
| 4:2022cv01037 |
| September 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Shirley Padmore Mensah |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #13 First MOTION to Amend/Correct #4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) First MOTION for Joinder Additional defendant Platinum Speciality Services, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Benito Roberto Otero Ramirez. (Millan, Cesar) |
| Filing 13 First MOTION to Amend/Correct #4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) , First MOTION for Joinder Additional defendant by Plaintiff Benito Roberto Otero Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Amended Complaint)(Millan, Cesar) |
| Filing 12 FULL CONSENT has been received by Plaintiff Benito Roberto Otero Ramirez, Defendant River Cement Co. (EAB) |
Filing 11
ORDER STAYING CASE AND VACATING RULE 16 CONFERENCE (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Consent Motion to Stay Litigation (Doc. #10 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows. With respect to the deadline for filing the consent/option form, the motion is DENIED. No later than November 8, 2022, each party must submit to the Clerk's Office the consent/option form either consenting to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge or opting to have the case assigned to a United States District Judge. In all other respects, the motion is GRANTED, and all other deadlines in this case are STAYED until Thursday, November 24, 2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the conference currently set to occur on November 15, 2022, is CANCELLED. The Court will re-set the conference at an appropriate time. (Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 11/8/2022) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on 10/26/2022. (JEB)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION to Stay by Plaintiff Benito Roberto Otero Ramirez. (Millan, Cesar) |
|
Filing 9
RULE 16 ORDER (See Full Order) This case is assigned to Track: 2 StandardNotice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 11/8/2022. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 11/8/2022. Rule 16 Conference set for 11/15/2022 10:00 AM in Zoom Video Conference before Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on 10/6/2022. (JEB)
|
|
Filing 8
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) by Defendant River Cement Co.; ORDERED GRANTED. River Cement Co. answer due 11/4/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on 10/6/2022. (JEB)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) by Defendant River Cement Co.. (Slavens, Kenneth) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant River Cement Co. Sent To: State Court - Executed (Slavens, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of Jefferson County, filed by Benito Roberto Otero Ramirez.(JBH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant River Cement Co. Sent To: Plaintiff (Slavens, Kenneth) Modified on 9/28/2022 to correct docket text (JBH). |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendants River Cement Co., RC Lonestar Inc., Buzzi Unicem SpA . (Slavens, Kenneth) Modified on 9/28/2022 to correct text (JBH). Modified on 9/29/2022 (CBL). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jefferson County Circuit Court, case number 22JE-CC00676, with receipt number AMOEDC-9531004, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by River Cement Co. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Attachment State Court File, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Original Filing Form)(Slavens, Kenneth) Modified on 9/28/2022 to correct docket text (JBH). |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Shirley P. Mensah. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JBH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ramirez v. River Cement Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Benito Roberto Otero Ramirez | |
| Represented By: | Cesar A. Millan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: River Cement Co. doing business as Buzzi Unicem USA Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth A. Slavens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
