Lauritsen v. Doe et al
| Susan C. Lauritsen |
| Jane Doe and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 4:2022cv01073 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John M Bodenhausen |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant State Farm's Unopposed Motion to Strike Prayer for Punitive Damages (ECF No.7) is GRANTED. See Peterson v. Continental Boiler Works, Inc., 783 S.W.2d 896, 902 (Mo. banc 1990) ("[T]he general rule is that punitive damages may not be recovered in breach of contract actions."). Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 11/30/2022. (NDT)
|
| Filing 11 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by James A. Wilke for Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Wilke, James) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.(Wilke, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #7 MOTION to Strike #3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Prayer for Punitive Damages filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Wilke, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Strike #3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Prayer for Punitive Damages by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Wilke, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Wilke, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Daniel E. Wilke for Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Wilke, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL Docket Sheet from State Court by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Wilke, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis City Circuit Court, filed by Susan C. Lauritsen.(JBH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Sent To: Plaintiff (JBH) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis City, case number 2222-CC09435, with receipt number AMOEDC-9547932, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons, #4 Exhibit Plaintiff's Petition filed in State Court, #5 Exhibit Notice to Attorney)(Wilke, Daniel) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within 10 days of the filing of the first pleading or entry of appearance # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH) |
| ***REMARK Contacted the Defendant Attorney for State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and directed them to file the state court docket sheet. (JBH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
