White v. Ameren et al
Plaintiff: Tenisha White
Defendant: Ameren and Adam Kashyap
Case Number: 4:2022cv01120
Filed: October 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Shirley Padmore Mensah
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Summons Issued as to defendant Ameren. The summons was hand delivered to USMS for service. (JEB) (Main Document 8 replaced on 11/4/2022) (JEB).
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL pursuant to 28 U.S.C.1915(e)(2)(B): In accordance with the Opinion, Memorandum and Order entered herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq. and Age Discrimination in Employment Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 621, et seq., for employment discrimination based on race, color, gender, and age against defendant Adam Kashyap are DISMISSED, without prejudice, as they are legally frivolous and fail to state a claim for relief. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal of this Order of Partial Dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 11/3/2022. (JEB)
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. #2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel [ECF No. #3 ] is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs claims against defendant Adam Kashyap are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue as to defendant Ameren at the address provided by plaintiff: 1901 Chouteau, St. Louis, Missouri 63103. An Order of Partial Dismissal will accompany this Order. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 11/3/2022. (JEB)
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6, 7. Copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Thu Nov 3 15:05:49 CDT 2022 (Bailey, Jennifer)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Oct 25 12:01:41 CDT 2022 (admin,)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JBH)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Shirley P. Mensah. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within 10 days of the filing of the first pleading or entry of appearance # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Tenisha White. (JBH)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Tenisha White. (JBH)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Tenisha White. (JBH)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Ameren, Adam Kashyap Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Tenisha White. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 EEOC Charge of Discrimination, #4 Right to Sue Letter, #5 Exhibit Email Exhibits)(JBH) Modified on 10/25/2022 to correct docket text (JBH).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Ameren et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tenisha White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ameren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam Kashyap
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?