White v. Rule
| Kevin White |
| T. Rule and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 4:2022cv01179 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Sarah E Pitlyk |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Kenneth R. Tihen for Respondent Kenneth R. Tihen. (Tihen, Kenneth) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Kevin White. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JWD) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Kevin White. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Kevin White. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - BOP Documents, #2 Envelope Addressed to USDC, Southern District of Indiana, #3 Envelope from USDC, Southern District of Indiana)(JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Nov 7 15:01:28 CST 2022 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
