Rhoads v. Webster University
Jeanie Rhoads |
Webster University |
4:2022cv01196 |
November 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Sarah E Pitlyk |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to State Court filed by Defendant Webster University. (Prewitt, Kevin) |
![]() |
Filing 10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to State Court by Plaintiff Jeanie Rhoads. (Arri, Taylor) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Webster University.(Prewitt, Kevin) |
Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Travis R. Kearbey for Defendant Webster University. (Kearbey, Travis) |
Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Camille L. Roe for Defendant Webster University. (Roe, Camille) |
Filing 6 Electronic Notice - Application for Admission needed as to Gene P. Graham. Review of case shows that Attorney Gene P. Graham is not currently a member of our Bar. For instructions on applying for bar admission or moving for pro hac vice admission, please follow the instructions located on our website at #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov under the Attorney tab. Notice only, no.pdf attached. (JDC) |
Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, filed by Jeanie Rhoads.(JDC) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (JDC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Webster University Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal)(Prewitt, Kevin) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Webster University Sent To: State Court - Executed (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice to State Court of Removal)(Prewitt, Kevin) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Webster University. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Prewitt, Kevin) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, case number 22SL-CC04709, with receipt number AMOEDC-9614419, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Webster University. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Amanda Siburt, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Original Filing Form)(Prewitt, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rhoads v. Webster University | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jeanie Rhoads | |
Represented By: | Gene P. Graham, Jr. |
Represented By: | Taylor Michelle Arri |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Webster University | |
Represented By: | Kevin Prewitt |
Represented By: | Camille L. Roe |
Represented By: | Travis R. Kearbey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.