Deuser v. Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP et al
Eddie Deuser |
Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP and The Coca Cola Company |
4:2022cv01202 |
November 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
John A Ross |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER: Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall re-serve defendant The Coca Cola Company within 14 days with a copy of the Petition (ECF No. #8 ) and the with the Order Requiring Joint Proposed Scheduling Plan (ECF No. #13 ). Plaintiff shall file a Notice of Process Server and attach an alias summons. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/6/23. (JAB) |
Filing 13 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING PLAN: This case is assigned to Track: 2. No later than January 27, 2023, counsel shall file with the Clerk of the Court a joint proposed scheduling plan. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (Joint Scheduling Plan due by 1/27/2023.) Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/6/2023. (LNJ) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Eddie Deuser. The Coca Cola Company served on 11/28/2022, answer due 12/19/2022. (Burke, Candice) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Eddie Deuser Process Server: Scott Worth (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons for Coca Cola)(Burke, Candice) |
Summons Issued as to defendant The Coca Cola Company. The summons was emailed to attorney Candice Burke. (JAB) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM re #8 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Request for Issuance of Summons on Defendant Coca-Cola by Plaintiff Eddie Deuser. (Burke, Candice) |
Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Candice Rose Burke for Plaintiff Eddie Deuser. (Burke, Candice) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hayes, Tracy) |
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, Original Filing Form by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP. (Hayes, Tracy) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable John A. Ross. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within 10 days of the filing of the first pleading or entry of appearance # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP. WSE Management, LLC, WSE Investment, LLC, Wal-Mart Stores East LLC, Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart de Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V., Massmart Holdings Limited. (Hayes, Tracy) Modified on 11/14/2022 to correct docket text (JWD). Modified on 11/16/2022 (CBL). |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP. (Hayes, Tracy) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP.(Hayes, Tracy) |
Filing 8 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Adair County Circuit Court, filed by Eddie Deuser.(JWD) |
Filing 2 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, Civil Coversheet by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP. (Hayes, Tracy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Adair County, Missouri, case number 22AR-CV00689, with receipt number AMOEDC-9616589, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Notice to Clerk Unexecuted)(Hayes, Tracy) Modified on 11/14/2022 (JWD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.