Sullivan Precision Metal Finishing, Inc. v. Tecnoplast USA, LLC
| Sullivan Precision Metal Finishing, Inc. |
| Tecnoplast, LLC and Tecnoplast USA, LLC |
| 4:2022cv01259 |
| November 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Patricia L Cohen |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 FULL CONSENT has been received by Plaintiff Sullivan Precision Metal Finishing, Inc., Defendant Tecnoplast USA, LLC. (LNJ) |
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCE: This case has been randomly assigned to a United States Magistrate Judge. Unless previously submitted, no later than January 17, 2023, each party must submit to the Clerk's Office the consent/option form either consenting to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge or opting to have the case assigned to a United States District Judge. A Scheduling Conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 is set for February 14, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Courtroom 9N. No later than February 7, 2023, counsel shall file with the Clerk of the Court a joint proposed scheduling plan. This case is assigned to Track: 2. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (Joint Scheduling Plan due by 2/7/2023. Rule 16 Conference set for 2/14/2023 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9N - St. Louis before Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 1/11/2023. (CLT)
|
| Notice from Clerk instructing Defendant Tecnoplast USA, LLC to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 1/17/2023. (CLT) |
|
Filing 13
Docket Text ORDER: Defendant Tecnoplast USA, LLC's consent motion for extension of time to file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff's complaint is GRANTED. Tecnoplast's answer is due 1/27/2023. (answer due 1/27/2023.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 12/28/2022. (LNJ)
|
| Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #7 Petition (Removal/Transfer) by Defendant Tecnoplast USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order on Consent Motion for Extension of Time)(Avery, R.) |
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Sullivan Precision Metal Finishing, Inc.. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Jarvis, William) |
| Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael E. Kaemmerer for Plaintiff Sullivan Precision Metal Finishing, Inc.. (Kaemmerer, Michael) |
|
Filing 9
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Tecnoplast USA, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time)(Avery, R.) ; ORDERED GRANTED. Tecnoplast USA, LLC answer due 12/28/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 11/29/22. (JAB)
|
| Filing 8 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Filing 7 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of Franklin County, filed by Sullivan Precision Metal Finishing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Exhibit 1, #2 Attachment Exhibit 2)(JBH) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Tecnoplast USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time)(Avery, R.) Modified on 11/28/2022 to correct docket text (JBH). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Tecnoplast USA, LLC Sent To: Plaintiff (JBH) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Patricia L. Cohen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within 10 days of the filing of the first pleading or entry of appearance # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Zachary Robert McMichael for Defendant Tecnoplast USA, LLC. (McMichael, Zachary) Modified on 11/28/2022 to correct docket text (JBH). |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL NON-MOTION EVENT filed by Defendant Tecnoplast USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Original Filing Form)(Avery, R.) Modified on 11/28/2022 to correct docket text (JBH). |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendants Tecnoplast USA, LLC, Tecnoplast, S.r.l., Gloria Da Ros, Ronnie Da Ros, Roberto Da Ras, Giuliana Romano. (Avery, R.) Modified on 11/28/2022 (CBL). Modified on 11/28/2022 to correct docket text (JBH). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Franklin County, Missouri, case number 22AB-CC00234, with receipt number AMOEDC-9639326, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Tecnoplast USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - State Court Docket Sheet and Filings, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Notice to State Court of Removal to Federal Court, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Notice to Parties of Notice of Removal)(Avery, R.) Modified on 11/28/2022 to correct docket text (JBH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
