Bell v. Annie's, Inc.
| Joshua Bell |
| Annie's, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv01367 |
| December 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff Joshua Bell. (Harvath, Daniel) |
Filing 17
Docket Text ORDER Re: #16 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Thomas J. Tobin by Defendant Annie's, Inc.; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 1/25/2023. (TMT)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Thomas J. Tobin. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9742069) by Defendant Annie's, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing Certificate of Good Standing: DC Bar)(Tobin, Thomas) |
|
Filing 15
Docket Text ORDER Re: #14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Regina LaMonica by Defendant Annie's, Inc.; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 1/23/2023. (TMT)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Regina LaMonica. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9737642) by Defendant Annie's, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(LaMonica, Regina) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE by Defendant Annie's, Inc. re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Case , #12 Memorandum in Support of Motion, Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Hatfield, Charles) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Case Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Annie's, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Hatfield, Charles) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Annie's, Inc.. (Hatfield, Charles) |
| Filing 10 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Matthew T. Schelp for all further proceedings. (JAB) |
|
Filing 9
Docket Text ORDER: Defendant Annies Inc.'s unopposed motion for an extension of time to file its responsive pleading [ECF No. #4 ] is GRANTED. It is hereby ordered that Defendant Annie's deadline to answer or otherwise plead in response to the complaint is set for January 19, 2023; Plaintiff's deadline to oppose a motion to dismiss is due by February 15, 2023; and Annie's reply brief is due on March 8, 2023. (Annie's, Inc. answer due 1/19/2023.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 12/28/2022. (LNJ)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE to Clerk of Court of Removal: by Defendant Annie's, Inc. (Hatfield, Charles) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Renee Elaine Henson for Defendant Annie's, Inc.. (Henson, Renee) |
| Filing 6 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Charles County, filed by Joshua Bell.(JBH) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Patricia L. Cohen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JBH) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of: Time to File Its Response to Plaintiff's Complaint and Request for Briefing Schedule by Defendant Annie's, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hatfield, Charles) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Annie's, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Hatfield, Charles) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendants Annie's, Inc., General Mills, Inc... (Hatfield, Charles) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Charles County Circuit Court, case number 2211-CC1009, with receipt number AMOEDC-9686871, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Annie's, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Docket, #4 Original Filing Form, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hatfield, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bell v. Annie's, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joshua Bell | |
| Represented By: | Daniel F. Harvath |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Annie's, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Charles W. Hatfield |
| Represented By: | Thomas J. Tobin |
| Represented By: | Regina LaMonica |
| Represented By: | Renee Elaine Henson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
