Cook v. Stroud
| Daniel Lee Cook |
| Marcy Stroud |
| 4:2023cv00004 |
| January 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***REMARK - Case transferred from Missouri Eastern has been opened in Southern District of Iowa as case 4:23-cv-00031. (KXS) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Accordingly, the Court denies as moot Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail to Plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet in this closed action. The Court further orders that Plaintiff must file any future documents or pleadings in connection with his case directly with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, Davenport Division. Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 1/23/23. (JAB) Remark: Copy of docket sheet and order mailed to plaintiff.
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Daniel Lee Cook. (LNJ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF TRANSFER: For the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order entered this same date, the Court orders the transfer of this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, Davenport Division. (Case to be transferred after 1/23/2023.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 1/9/2023. (CLT)
|
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court directs the Clerk to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, Davenport Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (Case to be transferred after 1/23/2023.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 1/9/2023. (CLT) |
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 2,3. Mon Jan 9 14:51:41 CST 2023 (Thoele, Cassandra)
|
| Filing 1 Document entitled "PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM A CONVICTION OR SENTENCE BY A PERSON IN STATES CUSTUDY" docketed as PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY by Petitioner Daniel Lee Cook. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DLB) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Jan 3 15:00:47 CST 2023 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Clark. (DLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cook v. Stroud | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Daniel Lee Cook | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Marcy Stroud | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
