Jordan v. The Coca-Cola Company
| Kevin Jordan |
| Coca-Cola Company, The and The Coca-Cola Company |
| 4:2023cv00028 |
| January 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Sarah E Pitlyk |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Summons Issued as to defendant The Coca-Cola Company. The summons was emailed to Daniel Harvath this date. (KRZ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Kevin Jordan Process Server: Evolution Process Servers (Harvath, Daniel) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within 10 days of the filing of the first pleading or entry of appearance # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH) |
| ***REMARK Contacted the Plaintiff attorney on 1/10/2023 and directed them to file a a Notice of Process Server. As of 1/11/2023 at 8:56AM there has been no response. Case will proceed with Judge assignment and case opening. (JBH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Coca-Cola Company, The with receipt number AMOEDC-9712224, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Kevin Jordan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Original Filing Form)(Harvath, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
