Stewart v. Green et al
| James Stewart |
| Logan Green and Lyft Inc |
| 4:2023cv00045 |
| January 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff James Stewart. (JWD) [Clerk's note: plaintiff's motion contains the language "See Attached." No other documents were attached to plaintiff's motion.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Logan Green, Lyft Inc, Jury Demand,filed by James Stewart. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Correspondence from Lyft, #2 Exhibit B - Screenshot)(JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Jan 11 16:03:12 CST 2023 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Chief U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Clark. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within 10 days of the filing of the first pleading or entry of appearance # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
