Christensen et al v. Louisville Ladder, Inc. et al
| Jessica Lawrence and Andrew Christensen |
| Louisville Ladder, Inc. and Walmart, Inc. |
| 4:2023cv00136 |
| February 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Timothy Dylan Reeves. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9882270) by Defendant Louisville Ladder, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing (Tennessee))(Reeves, Timothy)
|
|
Filing 27
Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Defendant Walmart, Inc. - SECOND NOTICE. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (JEB)
|
|
Filing 26
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Defenses, Affirmative Defenses and Jury Demand as to allegations made by Plaintiff Andrew Christensen by Louisville Ladder, Inc..(Fogarty, Glennon)
|
|
Filing 25
MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #24 MOTION to Dismiss :Counts XI, XII and XIII of Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Defendant Louisville Ladder, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 5.11.2020 correspondence)(Fogarty, Glennon)
|
|
Filing 24
MOTION to Dismiss :Counts XI, XII and XIII of Plaintiffs' Complaint by Defendant Louisville Ladder, Inc.. (Fogarty, Glennon)
|
|
Filing 23
ENTRY of Appearance by Madeline Townsley for Defendant Louisville Ladder, Inc.. (Townsley, Madeline)
|
|
Filing 22
MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #21 MOTION to Dismiss Party (Defendant, Walmart Inc.'s, Motion to Dismiss Counts III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII and XIII of Plaintiffs' Complaint) Walmart filed by Defendant Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Boggs, Beth)
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION to Dismiss Party (Defendant, Walmart Inc.'s, Motion to Dismiss Counts III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII and XIII of Plaintiffs' Complaint) Walmart by Defendant Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Boggs, Beth)
|
|
Filing 20
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Jessica Lawrence. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Seamands, Michael)
|
|
Filing 19
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Andrew Christensen. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Seamands, Michael)
|
|
Filing 18
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants Louisville Ladder, Inc., Grupo Cuprum, S.A.P.I. de C.V... (Ramsey, Ian)
|
|
Filing 17
Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Plaintiffs Andrew Christensen, Jessica Lawrence, Defendant Walmart, Inc. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (JEB)
|
|
Filing 16
Docket Text ORDER: Re #14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Ian T. Ramsey. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached by Defendant Louisville Ladder, Inc.; GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 3/27/23. (EAB)
|
|
Filing 15
Docket Text ORDER: Re #13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Chelsea R. Stanley. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached by Defendant Louisville Ladder, Inc.; GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 3/27/23. (EAB)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Ian T. Ramsey. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9856994) by Defendant Louisville Ladder, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing (Kentucky))(Ramsey, Ian)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Chelsea R. Stanley. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9856965) by Defendant Louisville Ladder, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing (Indiana))(Stanley, Chelsea)
|
|
Filing 12
Docket Text ORDER: Re #10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Defendant Louisville Ladder, Inc.; ORDERED ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED UP TO AND INCLUDING APRIL 3, 2023. (Louisville Ladder, Inc. answer due 4/3/2023). Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 3/23/23. (EAB)
|
|
Filing 11
Docket Text ORDER: Re #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant Walmart, Inc; ORDERED ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED UP TO AND INCLUDING APRIL 3, 2023. (Walmart, Inc. answer due 4/3/2023). Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 3/22/23. (EAB)
|
|
Filing 10
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Louisville Ladder, Inc.. (Fogarty, Glennon)
|
|
Filing 9
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant Walmart, Inc.. (Boggs, Beth)
|
|
Filing 8
ENTRY of Appearance by Beth C. Boggs for Defendant Walmart, Inc.. (Boggs, Beth)
|
|
Filing 7
DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendants Louisville Ladder, Inc., Grupo Cuprum, S.A.P.I. de C.V... (Fogarty, Glennon)
|
|
Filing 6
Docket Text ORDER Re: #5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by Defendant Louisville Ladder, Inc.; ORDERED ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED UP TO AND INCLUDING MARCH 22, 2023. (Louisville Ladder, Inc. answer due 3/22/2023.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 3/1/2023. (HMA)
|
|
Filing 5
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Louisville Ladder, Inc.. (Fogarty, Glennon)
|
|
Filing 4
ENTRY of Appearance by Glennon P. Fogarty for Defendant Louisville Ladder, Inc.. (Fogarty, Glennon)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Andrew Christensen, Jessica Lawrence. All Defendants served on 8/2/23; Answer due 3/1/23. (Seamands, Michael) Modified on 2/9/2023 (EAB).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs Andrew Christensen, Jessica Lawrence Process Server: John Houseman (JDC)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-9767666, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Andrew Christensen, Jessica Lawrence. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Form Notice of Intent to Use Process Server, #4 Summons Summons (Louisville Ladder, Inc.), #5 Summons Summons (Walmart Inc.))(Seamands, Michael) (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/7/2023) (JDC).
|
|
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry Edward Autrey. 2 Summons(es) issued and emailed to Attorney Michael C. Seamands. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within 10 days of the filing of the first pleading or entry of appearance # (moed-0001.pdf). (JDC)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
