McCauley v. 24 Franchise Group, LLC
| Maryanne McCauley |
| 24 Franchise Group, LLC |
| 4:2023cv00215 |
| February 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: 1. Scheduling conference: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a scheduling conference is set for May 24, 2023 at 4:00 p.m. CT by Zoom. Conference participants will receive an email with a link to access the conference. Lead trial counsel must participate in the conference. (Joint Scheduling Plan due by 5/15/2023. Rule 16 Conference set for 5/24/2023 04:00 PM in Zoom Video Conference before Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark. Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 4/19/23.) (JAB)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by 24 Franchise Group, LLC.(Donelan, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 Docket Text ORDER: The Court grants Andrew Donelan's #4 motion for leave to appear pro hac vice. Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 4/19/2023. (CLT) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Andrew Donelan. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9901715) by Defendant 24 Franchise Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Letter Good Standing)(Donelan, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Maryanne McCauley 24 Franchise Group, LLC waiver signed on 2/23/2023, answer due 4/24/2023. (Schapiro, Douglas) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Chief U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Clark. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to Douglas Schapiro. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within 10 days of the filing of the first pleading or entry of appearance # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Maryanne McCauley Process Server: SRI Process (Schapiro, Douglas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant 24 Franchise Group, LLC with receipt number AMOEDC-9798339, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Maryanne McCauley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt, #2 Exhibit Selfie, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Original Filing Form)(Schapiro, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McCauley v. 24 Franchise Group, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maryanne McCauley | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Schapiro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 24 Franchise Group, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrew J. Donelan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
