Curtis v. State of Missouri et al
| Dustin Patrick Curtis |
| State of Missouri, St. Charles County Correctional Center, St. Peters Police Department, Officer Ms. Unknown Smith, Officer Unknown Anderson, All Arresting Officers on the Scene and Through Transport, Sheriff of St. Peters Police Department, Governor Mike Parson, Attorney General Eric Smitt and Whoever Was In Charge of Putting Me Under Observation in the Suicide Unit |
| 4:2023cv00381 |
| March 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Ronnie L White |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER of USCA: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. USCA Appeal #: 23-1868 (KCD)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER of USCA: The district court has determined that Appellant has three "strikes" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due May 30, 2023. USCA Appeal #: 23-1868 (KCD)
|
| Filing 12 Initial Notification from USCA for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Dustin Patrick Curtis USCA Appeal Number: 23-1868.(KCD) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by clerk to USCA regarding #4 Order of Dismissal pursuant to 28USC1915(e)(2)(B),. Notice of Appeal filed on 4/24/23 by Plaintiff Dustin Patrick Curtis. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTY: FILE REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT WITH DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OFFICE.(JWD) |
| Filing 10 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by clerk to USCA regarding #4 Order of Dismissal pursuant to 28USC1915(e)(2)(B),. Notice of Appeal filed on 4/24/23 by Plaintiff Dustin Patrick Curtis. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTY: FILE REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT WITH DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OFFICE.(JWD) |
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. #8 ] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 04/25/2023. (KCD)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 9. Tue Apr 25 13:10:11 CDT 2023 (Davis, Kinica)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal by Plaintiff Dustin Patrick Curtis. (KCD) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Plaintiff Dustin Patrick Curtis. (KCD) |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Dustin Patrick Curtis. (TMT) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Clerk sent to pro-se prisoner re:FRAP - all procedures for filing Notice of Appeal (copy of motion to proceed IFP on appeal attached and mailed) (KCD) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that alternatively, this action is DISMIISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 04/12/2023. (KCD)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's application to proceed in the district court without prepaying fees and costs [ECF No. #2 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is subject to dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the alternative, this action is subject to dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith. An Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 04/12/2023. (KCD)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3,4,5. Wed Apr 12 16:16:29 CDT 2023 (Davis, Kinica)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dustin Patrick Curtis. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement)(BRP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, Jury Demand, filed by Dustin Patrick Curtis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Inmate Mugshot, #2 Correspondence, #3 Envelope)(JWD) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Ronnie L. White. (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Mar 27 16:00:57 CDT 2023 (admin,) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
