Chamness v. Centurion et al
| William Ray Chamness |
| Centurion of Missouri, Laura Manford, Shanta Coffman, Jerry Lovelace, Centurion, FNU Gately-Ball, John Doe/Jane Roe I and E.W. Jackson |
| 4:2023cv00449 |
| April 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Patricia L Cohen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Letter to the Clerk filed by plaintiff William Ray Chamness (JAB) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, by Plaintiff William Ray Chamness. (CLT) |
| Filing 10 Letter (Second) from Clerk sent to Plaintiff William Ray Chamness re: Failure to file Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 5/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Form moed-0064 - notice re magistrate judge jurisdiction) (LNJ) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 10. Mailed to party not set up for electronic delivery. Thu May 11 14:23:52 CDT 2023 (Jones, Lauren)
|
| Filing 9 Letter from Clerk sent to Plaintiff William Ray Chamness re: Failure to file Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 5/10/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction) (JAB) |
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 9. Mailed to party not set-up for electronic notification Wed May 3 13:57:35 CDT 2023 (Bernsen, John)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Centurion, Shanta Coffman, Jerry Lovelace, Laura Manford Sent To: State Court - Executed (Harms, Dennis) |
| Filing 7 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Filing 6 PRO SE MOTION ACCESS TO THE COURTS/OPEN COURTS RIGHT(S) INCLUDING WRIT(S) OF HABEAS CORPUS by Plaintiff William Ray Chamness. (JBH) |
| Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Francois County, filed by William Ray Chamness.(JBH) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Patricia L. Cohen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JBH) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants Centurion of Missouri, Centurion, LLC, Centurion Equity, Inc... (Harms, Dennis) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Centurion of Missouri, Shanta Coffman, Jerry Lovelace, Laura Manford Sent To: Plaintiff (Harms, Dennis) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Dennis S. Harms for Defendants Centurion of Missouri, Shanta Coffman, Jerry Lovelace, Laura Manford. (Harms, Dennis) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Francois County, case number 23SF-CC00042, with receipt number AMOEDC-9885005, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Shanta Coffman, Laura Manford, Centurion of Missouri, Jerry Lovelace. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C - Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Original Filing Form)(Harms, Dennis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
