Twitty v. State of Missouri
| Andre J. Twitty |
| State of Missouri |
| 4:2023cv00473 |
| April 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John M Bodenhausen |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER of USCA as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Andre J. Twitty: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, pre-sentence report (3 copies), exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. USCA Appeal #: 23-2302 (ANP)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER of USCA as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Andre J. Twitty: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by June 20, 2023, an order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. USCA Appeal #: 23-2302 (ANP)
|
|
Filing 7
Initial Notification from USCA for #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Andre J. Twitty; USCA Appeal Number: 23-2302(ANP)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by clerk to USCA regarding #4 Order of Dismissal (2254),. Notice of Appeal filed on 5/26/2023 by Petitioner Andre J. Twitty. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTY: FILE REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT WITH DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OFFICE.(JBH)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Order of Dismissal (2254) by Petitioner Andre J. Twitty. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (KRZ)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED and DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 4/19/2023. (HMA)
|
|
Filing 3
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 [ECF No. #1 ] is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. An Order of Dismissal will accompany this Opinion, Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 4/19/2023. (HMA)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3, 4 . copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Wed Apr 19 15:48:10 CDT 2023 (Aubuchon, Heather)
|
|
Filing 2
Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the amount of $5.00 receipt number STL-15346 , by Petitioner Andre J. Twitty. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State of MO Orders, #2 Exhibit 2 - Unstapled Detainer, #3 Exhibit 3 - Change in Law, #4 Exhibit 4 - Order in 4:21-cv-00875 NAB, #5 Exhibit 5 - New 2254 Motion, #6 Exhibit 6 - Detainer Law EDMO, #7 Envelope), #8 Original Filing Form) (JWD).
|
|
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Apr 14 15:01:22 CDT 2023 (admin,)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Twitty v. State of Missouri | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Andre J. Twitty | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of Missouri | |
| Represented By: | Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
