United States of America v. Seven Thousand, Five Hundred Ninety Five Dollars and in U.S. Currency
United States of America |
Seven Thousand, Five Hundred Ninety Five Dollars in U.S. Currency |
Cornelius Bennett |
4:2023cv00518 |
April 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Henry Edward Autrey |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Verified Claim to #7,595.00 US Currency by Claimant Cornelius Bennett. (EAB) |
Filing 5 MARSHAL Return Executed - Delivered to Yvatni Bennett on 5/3/23. Type of return Complaint and Notice. (EAB) |
Filing 4 MARSHAL Return Executed - Delivered to Yvatni Bennett on 4/27/23. Type of return Complaint and Notice. (EAB) |
Filing 3 MARSHAL Return Executed - Delivered to Cornelius Bennett on 4/27/23. Type of return Complaint and Notice. (EAB) |
Filing 2 MARSHAL Return as to currency on 4/24/2023. Complaint and warrant served on asset. (JEB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT of Forfeiture against defendant $7,595.00 U.S. Currency Non-Jury Demand,, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Warrant)(Clow, Jonathan) |
Forfeiture Warrant Issued as to defendant Seven Thousand, Five Hundred Ninety Five Dollars in U.S. Currency. (JWD) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry Edward Autrey. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.