Burgess v. Fan et al
| Julie Burgess |
| Benny Fan, Irene Fan and Irene P. Fan |
| 4:2023cv00541 |
| April 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Julie Burgess as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons Unexecuted)(Ashbrook, Amy) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Julie Burgess. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Ashbrook, Amy) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Chief U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Clark. 2 Summons(es) issued and emailed to Amy Ashbrook. (JBH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Julie Burgess Process Server: James Womble (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice of Intent to use Process Server, #2 Summons Summons, #3 Summons Summons)(Ashbrook, Amy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-9915180, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Julie Burgess. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET, #2 Attachment Business Entity Disclosure, #3 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form)(Ashbrook, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
