Dean v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
| Brent Dean |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Corporation |
| 4:2023cv00580 |
| May 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Rodney W Sippel |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #25 MOTION to Dismiss Case , #23 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Plaintiff Brent Dean. (Koc, Kevin) |
| Filing 28 ANSWER to #22 Amended Complaint, by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Goldman, Kathleen) |
| Filing 27 ANSWER to #22 Amended Complaint, by Norfolk Southern Corporation.(Goldman, Kathleen) |
| Filing 26 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #25 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Norfolk Southern Corporation. (Goldman, Kathleen) |
| Filing 25 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Norfolk Southern Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Goldman, Kathleen) |
| Filing 24 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #23 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Ex. A - Rickard Affidavit)(Goldman, Kathleen) |
| Filing 23 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Goldman, Kathleen) |
| Filing 22 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation Amendment to #7 Amended Petition (Removal/Transfer) no Summons(es) issued, Waivers issued none, Consents issued none, jury demand,, filed by Brent Dean. Related document: #7 Amended Petition (Removal/Transfer) filed by Brent Dean.(NEP) |
Filing 21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for leave to file an amended complaint #19 is granted, and the amended complaint [19-1] is deemed filed as of this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss #10 directed at the original complaint is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 06/05/2023. (KRZ)
|
| Filing 20 RESPONSE to Motion re #19 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint, #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff Brent Dean. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint)(Koc, Kevin) |
| Filing 19 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Brent Dean. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint)(Koc, Kevin) |
| Filing 18 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Plaintiff Brent Dean . Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (ANP) |
|
Filing 17
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Plaintiff Brent Dean. (Koc, Kevin) filed by Brent Dean; ORDERED GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Response due by 05/31/2023. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 05/25/2023. (ANP)
|
|
Filing 16
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Carl Misitano. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9964916) by Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: # 1 dated May 16, 2023)(Misitano, Carl) filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company ; ORDERED GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 05/25/2023. (ANP)
|
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Plaintiff Brent Dean. (Koc, Kevin) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Carl Misitano. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9964916) by Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 dated May 16, 2023)(Misitano, Carl) |
|
Filing 13
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Kathleen Jones Goldman. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9955215) by Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company.; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 05/19/2023. (KRZ)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Kathleen Jones Goldman. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9955215) by Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Goldman, Kathleen) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Patrick Rickard)(Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company Sent To: State Court - Executed (Attachments: #1 Acknowledged Notice to State Court Circuit Clerk)(Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 8 Electronic Notice - Application for Admission needed as to Kevin Koc. Review of case shows that Attorney Kevin Koc is not currently a member of our Bar. For instructions on applying for bar admission or moving for pro hac vice admission, please follow the instructions located on our website at #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov under the Attorney tab. Notice only, no.pdf attached. (JWD) |
| Filing 7 First Amended Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, filed by Brent Dean.(JWD) |
| Filing 6 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Brent Dean.(JWD) |
| Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation, High Point, Randleman, Asheboro and Southern Railroad Company, Mobile and Birmingham Railroad Company, Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company, North Carolina Midland Railroad Company, State University Railroad Co... (Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Kurt E. Reitz, I for Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice of Removal)(Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis, case number 2222-CC07676, with receipt number AMOEDC-9926261, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Amended Petition, #2 Exhibit B Entire St. Louis County file, #3 Exhibit C Entire St. Louis City file, #4 Exhibit D Dean I petition, #5 Exhibit E Settlement demand, #6 Exhibit F Dean I answers to interrogatories, #7 Exhibit G Affidavit, #8 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #9 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Reitz, Kurt) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Rodney W. Sippel. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
