Brown v. Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.
| Nelson Brown |
| Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. |
| 4:2023cv00675 |
| May 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #16 First MOTION for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Nelson Brown. (Bretz, Anthony) |
| Filing 16 First MOTION for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Nelson Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed First Amended Complaint)(Bretz, Anthony) |
| Filing 15 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case (PARTIAL) Joint Motion by Consent by Plaintiff Nelson Brown. (Bretz, Anthony) |
Filing 14
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #13 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case (PARTIAL) Joint Motion by Consent by Plaintiff Nelson Brown; ORDERED ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED UP TO AND INCLUDING JUNE 30, 2023. (Response to Court due by 6/30/2023) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 6/15/2023. (JEB)
|
| Filing 13 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case (PARTIAL) Joint Motion by Consent by Plaintiff Nelson Brown. (Bretz, Anthony) |
| Filing 12 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Plaintiff Nelson Brown. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (JEB) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case (PARTIAL) filed by Defendant Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rhoten, Katherine) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Case (PARTIAL) by Defendant Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.. (Rhoten, Katherine) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc..(Rhoten, Katherine) |
|
Filing 8
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal Petition by Defendant Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.; BY CONSENT OF THE PARTIES, ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED UP TO AND INCLUDING JUNE 2, 2023. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 5/26/2023. (JEB)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, by Defendant Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.. (Rhoten, Katherine) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Geoffrey M. Gilbert, Jr for Defendant Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.. (Gilbert, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Dean S. Kpere-Diabo for Defendant Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.. (Kpere-Diabo, Dean) |
| Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Nelson Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JBH) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry Edward Autrey. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Rhoten, Katherine) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc., Kindeva Drug Delivery, LP.. (Rhoten, Katherine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, case number 22SL-CC05353, with receipt number AMOEDC-9958545, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Petition, #2 Exhibit Summons, #3 Exhibit State Court Docket and File, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Original Filing Form)(Rhoten, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nelson Brown | |
| Represented By: | Anthony S. Bretz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Katherine M. Rhoten |
| Represented By: | Dean S. Kpere-Diabo |
| Represented By: | Geoffrey M. Gilbert, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
