Bennett v. USA
Petitioner: Cornelius Bennett
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2023cv00744
Filed: June 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Clark
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2023 Filing 4 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: This case has been assigned to Track 4 (Administrative). Respondent must show cause, in writing and within 45 days of the date of this order, why the relief requested in the instant motion to vacate should not be granted. If Movant chooses to file a reply to Respondent's answer, the reply must be filed within 60 days of the date the answer is filed. See Rule 5(d) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts. (Show Cause Response due by 9/16/2023.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 8/2/23. (JAB)
August 2, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Mailed to party not set-up for electronic notification Wed Aug 2 13:39:52 CDT 2023 (Bernsen, John)
July 31, 2023 Filing 3 AMENDED MOTION to Vacate Amending #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by Petitioner Cornelius Bennett. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Attachment Addendum, #3 Envelope)(LNJ)
June 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Accordingly, the Court orders Movant to file, within thirty days of the date of this Order, an amended Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence on the proper form. The Court also orders the Clerk to mail to Movant a copy of the Court's form Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence. Movant's failure to timely comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this case, without prejudice and without further notice. (Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 7/12/2023) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 6/12/23. (Attachments: #1 AO-243)(JAB)
June 12, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 2. Mailed to party not set-up for electronic notification Mon Jun 12 11:04:59 CDT 2023 (Bernsen, John)
June 7, 2023 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB)
June 7, 2023 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Chief U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Clark. (DLB)
June 7, 2023 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Jun 7 10:00:45 CDT 2023 (admin,)
June 6, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by Petitioner Cornelius Bennett. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DLB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bennett v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Cornelius Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Kourtney Michael Bell
Represented By: Cassandra Jane Wiemken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?