Johns v. Trottenberg
| Brad Johns |
| Polly Trottenberg |
| 4:2023cv00761 |
| June 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, Doc. #7 , is GRANTED. Defendant shall file her required response to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than September 14, 2023. (Answer due 09/14/2023) Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 08/07/2023. (KCD)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Polly Trottenberg. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sowles, Marcia) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Defendant Polly Trottenberg (Sowles, Marcia) Modified on 8/7/2023 (KCD). |
| Filing 5 Amended Summons Returned Executed as to USA: by Plaintiff Brad Johns (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proof of Service, #2 Attachment Proof of Service, #3 Attachment Proof of Service)(Vasseur-Browne, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Brad Johns. Defendant Polly Trottenberg served on 6/20/2023, answer due 8/21/2023. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proof of Service, #2 Attachment Proof of Service, #3 Attachment Proof of Service)(Vasseur-Browne, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL Memorandum by Plaintiff Brad Johns. (Attachments: #1 Summons of U.S. Attorney, #2 Summons of U.S. Attorney General, #3 Summons of Polly Trottenberg, #4 Summons of Allison Baxter, #5 Original Filing Form)(Vasseur-Browne, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Original Filing Form not filed and Summons were not filed at all. This deficiency must be filed in the case record immediately. (JBH) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Matthew T. Schelp. 4 Summons(es) issued and emailed to Elizabeth A. Vasseur-Browne. (JBH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Polly Trottenberg with receipt number AMOEDC-9992472$ 402.00 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Brad Johns. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vasseur-Browne, Elizabeth) Modified on 6/12/2023 to add receipt number (JBH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johns v. Trottenberg | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brad Johns | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth A. Vasseur-Browne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Polly Trottenberg | |
| Represented By: | Marcia Sowles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
