Marshall v. City of Arnold et al
Kevin Marshall |
City of Arnold, Police Officer W. Weaver, Police Officer J. Christopher, Arnold Police Department, Officer W. Weaver and Officer J. Christopher |
4:2023cv00807 |
June 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Matthew T Schelp |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Amendment to #1 Complaint , filed by Kevin Marshall. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Kevin Marshall.(Sims, Paul) |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #16 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant City of Arnold. (Bates, Rachel) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant City of Arnold. (Bates, Rachel) |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #14 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants J. Christopher, W. Weaver. (Bates, Rachel) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendants J. Christopher, W. Weaver. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Affidavit of Officer Christopher, #2 Exhibit B: Declaration of Officer Weaver)(Bates, Rachel) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Arnold Police Department. (Bates, Rachel) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Arnold Police Department. (Bates, Rachel) |
Filing 11 ENTRY of Appearance by Blake Daniel Hill for Defendants Arnold Police Department, J. Christopher, City of Arnold, W. Weaver. (Hill, Blake) |
Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Rachel A. Bates for Defendants Arnold Police Department, J. Christopher, City of Arnold, W. Weaver. (Bates, Rachel) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Kevin Marshall. J. Christopher served on 6/30/2023. (Sims, Paul) Modified on 7/11/2023 (BRP). (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/12/2023: #1 Summons) (BRP). |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Kevin Marshall. W. Weaver served on 6/30/2023. (Sims, Paul) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/12/2023: #1 Summons) (BRP). |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Kevin Marshall. Arnold Police Department served on 6/30/2023. (Sims, Paul) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/12/2023: #1 Summons) (BRP). |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Kevin Marshall. City of Arnold served on 6/30/2023. (Sims, Paul) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/12/2023: #1 Summons) (BRP). |
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL re #2 Supplemental by Plaintiff Kevin Marshall. (Sims, Paul) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #2 Supplemental. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Completed Summons for defendants W. Weaver and J. Christopher not filed. This deficiency must be filed in the case record immediately. (JWD) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Matthew T. Schelp. 4 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney Paul Sims. (JWD) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Kevin Marshall Process Server: The Whole Truth Investigative Group (JWD) |
Filing 2 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint supplement by Plaintiff Kevin Marshall. (Sims, Paul) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-10010959, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Kevin Marshall.(Sims, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.