Anderson et al v. MidFirst Bank
| Harry Anderson and Natalie Anderson |
| MidFirst Bank |
| 4:2023cv00848 |
| July 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Noelle C Collins |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal on or before September 25, 2023. All deadlines are stayed until that date. (Dismissal Paper(s) due by 9/25/2023.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 8/14/2023. (TMT)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement as to defendant MidFirst Bank by Harry Anderson, Natalie Anderson (Crump, James) |
| Notice from Clerk instructing Plaintiffs Harry Anderson, Natalie Anderson to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 8/8/2023.) (TMT) |
|
Filing 9
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's first Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer (Doc. #6 ) is GRANTED. Defendant shall file the answer on or before August 11, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 7/27/2023. (ESD)
|
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Rachel A. Hedley for Defendant MidFirst Bank. (Hedley, Rachel) |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by MidFirst Bank, Midland Financial Company. (Hedley, Rachel) Modified on 7/28/2023 (CBL). |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant MidFirst Bank. (Hedley, Rachel) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Harry Anderson, Natalie Anderson. MidFirst Bank served on 7/6/2023, answer due 7/27/2023. (Callahan, Ryan) (Main Document 5 replaced on 7/11/2023 to include complete copy of original Summons issued) (TMT). Modified on 7/11/2023 (TMT). |
| Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs Harry Anderson, Natalie Anderson Process Server: Oklahoma Judicial Process Servers (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Crump, James) |
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiffs Harry Anderson, Natalie Anderson. (Crump, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant MidFirst Bank with receipt number AMOEDC-10026797, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Harry Anderson, Natalie Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Crump, James) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney James Crump. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
