Cottle v. State of Missouri
| Bryan Cottle, Sr. |
| State of Missouri |
| 4:2023cv00854 |
| July 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John M Bodenhausen |
| Audrey G Fleissig |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 7/25/23. (KJS)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs application to proceed in the district court without prepayment of fees and costs is GRANTED. [ECF No. #2 ] The Court will waive the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). An Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 7/25/23. (KJS)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5,6. Tue Jul 25 11:21:40 CDT 2023 (Shirley, Kelley)
|
| Filing 4 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig for all further proceedings. (KEK) |
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Fri Jul 14 13:58:30 CDT 2023 (Kratzer, Katie)
|
| Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Jul 6 09:01:03 CDT 2023 (admin,) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Bryan Cottle, Sr. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant State of Missouri, Non-Jury Demand, filed by Bryan Cottle, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cottle v. State of Missouri | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bryan Cottle, Sr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of Missouri | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
