Whitley v. Precythe et al
| D'Andre Whitley |
| Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue, Lt. Jones, Lt. Hannewinkle and Sgt. McDaniel |
| 4:2023cv00898 |
| July 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to Plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint Under 42 U.S.C. 1983. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to Plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a signed amended complaint in accordance with the foregoing instructions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff must either pay the $402 filing fee, or file an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs along with a certified copy of his inmate account statement for the six-month period preceding the filing of the complaint. If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on July 28, 2023. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs)(BRP)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3. Sent to non-electronic party this date. Fri Jul 28 16:15:26 CDT 2023 (Porter, Brittany)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Jul 14 16:05:58 CDT 2023 (admin,)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
|
|
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Matthew T. Schelp. (JWD)
|
|
Filing 2
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER [COPY OF ORDER ENTERED IN 4:23-cv-00869 NCC]: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall STRIKE plaintiffs Chris DeWeese, Demeyon Watie, Terrell Reed, LaJuan Hayes, Thomas May, Dallas Conn, Adrian Shaw, Mark Powell, Willie Oliver, Joseph Gorski, Quincy Baisden, LaAnthony Jones, and DAndre Whitley from this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, using the complaint filed in the instant case, the Clerk of Court shall open a new prisoner civil rights case for Chris DeWeese, Demeyon Watie, Terrell Reed, LaJuan Hayes, Thomas May, Dallas Conn, Adrian Shaw, Mark Powell, Willie Oliver, Joseph Gorski, Quincy Baisden, LaAnthony Jones, and DAndre Whitley. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file a copy of this Opinion, Memorandum and Order in the new cases opened for Chris DeWeese, Demeyon Watie, Terrell Reed, LaJuan Hayes, Thomas May, Dallas Conn, Adrian Shaw, Mark Powell, Willie Oliver, Joseph Gorski, Quincy Baisden, LaAnthony Jones, and DAndre Whitley. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/13/23. (JWD)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against defendant Lt. Hannewinkle, Lt. Jones, Major Minchue, Anne L. Precythe, Sgt. McDaniel, Warden Hancock, Jury Demand,, filed by D'Andre Whitley.(JWD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
