Bowes v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
Charles Robert Bowes |
City of St. Louis, Missouri and Gregory F.X. Daly |
4:2023cv00974 |
August 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
Catherine D Perry |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly's Motion to Dismiss Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly's Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly. (McMichael, Zachary) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Charles Robert Bowes Process Server: Robert Pedroli (Attachments: #1 Summons)(NEP) |
Summons Issued as to defendant City of St. Louis, Missouri. The summons was emailed to Charles Bowes (crbowes@yahoo.com). (NEP) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly's Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Charles Robert Bowes. (ANP) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bowes shall cause service to be effected upon defendants no later than ninety (90) days from the date of this Order. In the absence of good cause shown, failure to timely serve a defendant may result in the dismissal of Bowes's claims against that defendant without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall forward toBowes with a copy of this Order, and for each defendant: i) a file-stamped copy of the second amended complaint; ii) a summons form; iii) a Notice of Intent to Use Private Process Server form; and iv) a Waiver of Service form. Signed by Sr. District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 08/28/2023. (Forms listed sent this date.)(KRZ) |
![]() |
Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Zachary Robert McMichael for Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly. (McMichael, Zachary) |
Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by David H. Luce for Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly. (Luce, David) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly's Motion to Dismiss Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly's Memorandum of Law in Support of His Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly. (McMichael, Zachary) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly's Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly. (McMichael, Zachary) |
Filing 4 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant City of St. Louis, Missouri, Gregory F.X. Daly; no Summonses issued, no Waivers issued, jury demand, filed by Charles Robert Bowes.(ANP) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Amendment to #1 Complaint, filed by Charles Robert Bowes. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Charles Robert Bowes.(KEK) |
Receipt: $ 402.00, receipt number STL-17036 Civil Filing Fee. (JWD) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Aug 10 13:01:09 CDT 2023 (admin,) |
![]() |
![]() |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Catherine D. Perry. (JWD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant City of St. Louis, Missouri, Gregory F.X. Daly, Jury Demand, filed by Charles Robert Bowes. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.