City of St. Louis v. CHS TX, INC. et al
St. Louis, Missouri, City of and City of St. Louis |
CHX TX, INC, Lexington Insurance Company, GREAT MIDWEST INSURANCE CO, CHX TX, INC. doing business as Yescare, Lexington Insurance Co. and Great Midwest Insurance, Co. |
4:2023cv00987 |
August 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Stephen R Clark |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (Reply In Support of It's Motion) filed by Defendant CHX TX, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proof of Claim #583, #2 Exhibit B - Proof of Claim #584, #3 Exhibit C- Email from Nellum to Smith 7-12-23, #4 Exhibit D - Email from Nellum to Smith 8-17-23)(Warburton, Reed) |
Filing 27 NOTICE of Filing Exhibit with the Clerk's Office in paper format by Defendant CHX TX, INC. re #26 Order, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Exhibit 1 to Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff's Complaint, #3 Exhibit C- Exhibit 3 to Plaintiff's Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Exhibit 4 to Plaintiff's Complaint, #5 Exhibit E- Exhibit 5 to Plaintiff's Complaint, #6 Exhibit F - Exhibit 6 to Plaintiff's Complaint, #7 Exhibit G - Exhibit 7 to Plaintiff's Complaint, #8 Exhibit H - Exhibit 8 to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Warburton, Reed) |
Filing 26 ORDER: Accordingly, the Court denies the City's motion to remand, Doc. #15 , and orders CHS TX to file all eight of the City's exhibits as a supplement to CHS TX's notice of removal. If CHS TX fails to do so by October 9, 2023, the Court will remand this case to state court for failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. 1446(a). (Response to Court due by 10/9/2023.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 10/2/2023. (LNJ) |
Filing 25 REPLY to Response to Motion re #15 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Plaintiff City of St. Louis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A_eFiling File Viewer, #2 Exhibit Ex B eFiling Notice, #3 Exhibit Ex C Declaration)(McGowan, Erin) |
Filing 24 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #23 MOTION for Extension of: Time to File A Reply In Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue by Defendant CHX TX, INC.. (Warburton, Reed); ORDERED GRANTED. (Reply due by 10/5/2023.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 9/22/23. (JAB) |
Filing 23 MOTION for Extension of: Time to File A Reply In Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue by Defendant CHX TX, INC.. (Warburton, Reed) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division filed by Plaintiff City of St. Louis. (McGowan, Erin) |
Filing 21 ENTRY of Appearance by Erin K. McGowan for Plaintiff City of St. Louis. (McGowan, Erin) |
Filing 20 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Stephen R. Welby termed. Case reassigned to Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark for all further proceedings (KJS) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Defendant CHX TX, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Service Packet Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Petition Exhibits)(Warburton, Reed) |
Notice from Clerk instructing Defendants CHX TX, INC., Great Midwest Insurance, Co., Plaintiff City of St. Louis to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 9/20/2023. (KJS) |
Filing 18 Docket Text ORDER: Motion for Extension of Time #17 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's response to Defendant CHX TX, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer #8 is due no later than September 15, 2023. So Ordered by Judge Stephen R. Welby on 09/05/23. (MCC) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of: Time by Plaintiff City of St. Louis. (McGowan, Erin) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #15 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Plaintiff City of St. Louis. (McGowan, Erin) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court by Plaintiff City of St. Louis. (McGowan, Erin) |
Filing 14 Great Midwest Insurance Co.'s ANSWER to Complaint by Great Midwest Insurance, Co..(Warburton, Reed) |
Filing 13 CHS TX, INC.'s ANSWER to Complaint by CHX TX, INC..(Warburton, Reed) |
Filing 12 Docket Text ORDER: Motion for Extension of Time #10 is GRANTED. Defendants' responsive pleading is due no later than August 25, 2023. So Ordered by Judge Stephen R. Welby on 08/16/23. (MCC) |
Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Great Midwest Insurance, Co., Skyward Specialty Insurance Company, Inc., Houston Specialty Insurance Company, Imperium Insurance Company.. (Warburton, Reed) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendants CHX TX, INC., Great Midwest Insurance, Co.. (Warburton, Reed) |
Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Reed Thomas Warburton for Defendant Great Midwest Insurance, Co.. (Warburton, Reed) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division by Defendant CHX TX, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Bankruptcy Petition, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - List of Unsecured Creditors)(Warburton, Reed) |
Filing 7 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by CHX TX, INC., YesCare Corp.. (Warburton, Reed) Modified on 8/9/2023 [DOCKET ENTRY #6 HAS THE CORRECT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT] (JBH). |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant CHX TX, INC. Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Notice of Removal)(Warburton, Reed) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by CHX TX, INC... (Warburton, Reed) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Proof of Service on All Adverse Parties (the Notice of Filing Notice of Removal to Plaintiff) not filed. This deficiency must be filed in the case record immediately. (JBH) |
Filing 2 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis City Circuit Court, filed by City of St. Louis.(JBH) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Welby. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court St. Louis City, MO, case number 2322-CC01330, with receipt number AMOEDC-10094445, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by CHX TX, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Great Midwest Insurance's Consent, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form)(Warburton, Reed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.