Varela et al v. Hill et al
Plaintiff: Ernesto Varela and Claudia Varela
Defendant: William Harold Hill, City of Wildwood, St. Louis County Police Department, Officer Jamie Reiter, Molly Proost and John Doe Officers
Case Number: 4:2023cv01016
Filed: August 16, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Sarah E Pitlyk
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2023 Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #9 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants City of Wildwood, Molly Proost. (Hale, Bryon)
August 23, 2023 Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendants City of Wildwood, Molly Proost. (Hale, Bryon)
August 17, 2023 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (JWD)
August 16, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Party William H. Hill for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant William Harold Hill. (JWD)
August 16, 2023 Filing 7 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Claudia Varela, Ernesto Varela.(JWD)
August 16, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants John Doe Officers, St. Louis County Police Department Sent To: Plaintiff and State Court Unexecuted (JWD)
August 16, 2023 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Case or quash service under 12(b)(4), or in the alternative to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Defendant John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Summons Return for Defendant Police Department, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Summons Return for Defendants John Doe Police Officers)(Huckeby, Matthew)
August 16, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Case or quash service under 12(b)(4), or in the alternative to dismiss for failure to state a claim by Defendant John Doe. (Huckeby, Matthew)
August 16, 2023 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #2 MOTION to Dismiss Case as a non-suable entity, or in the alternative, for failure to state a claim filed by Defendant St. Louis County Police Department. (Huckeby, Matthew)
August 16, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss Case as a non-suable entity, or in the alternative, for failure to state a claim by Defendant St. Louis County Police Department. (Huckeby, Matthew)
August 16, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 21st Judicial Circuit for the State of Missouri, case number 23SL-CC02849, with receipt number AMOEDC-10108988, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by John Doe, St. Louis County Police Department. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Complete State Court Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Notice of Removal to State Court and Plaintiff, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Defendant Hill Written Consent, #4 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Huckeby, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Varela et al v. Hill et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ernesto Varela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Claudia Varela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Harold Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Wildwood
Represented By: Bryon Earl Hale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: St. Louis County Police Department
Represented By: Matthew William Huckeby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Jamie Reiter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Molly Proost
Represented By: Bryon Earl Hale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Officers
Represented By: Matthew William Huckeby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?