Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. Miller Enterprise Group, LLC
| Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis, Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis, St. Louis Vacation Fund, Board of Trustees of the St. Louis Vacation Fund, Construction Laborers and Contractors Training Fund of Eastern Missouri, Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers & Contractors Training Fund of Eastern Missouri, Local Union Nos. 42-110, Laborers International Union of North America and AFL-CIO |
| Miller Enterprise Group, LLC |
| 4:2023cv01032 |
| August 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Miller Enterprise Group, LLC. (Lindley, Alexander); ORDERED GRANTED. Miller Enterprise Group, LLC answer due 11/13/2023. Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 10/12/23. (JAB) |
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Miller Enterprise Group, LLC. (Lindley, Alexander) |
| Filing 11 Docket Text ORDER: The Court grants Defendant's #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. (Miller Enterprise Group, LLC answer due 10/14/2023.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 9/8/2023. (CLT) |
| Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael E. Kaemmerer for Defendant Miller Enterprise Group, LLC. (Kaemmerer, Michael) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Miller Enterprise Group, LLC. (Lindley, Alexander) |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Local Union Nos. 42-110. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Martin, Janine) |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Construction Laborers and Contractors Training Fund of Eastern Missouri. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Martin, Janine) |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by St. Louis Vacation Fund. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Martin, Janine) |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Martin, Janine) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Martin, Janine) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Board of Trustees of the St. Louis Vacation Fund, AFL-CIO, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis, Construction Laborers and Contractors Training Fund of Eastern Missouri, Local Union Nos. 42-110, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers & Contractors Training Fund of Eastern Missouri, Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis, Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Laborers International Union of North America, St. Louis Vacation Fund. All Defendants. (Martin, Janine) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs AFL-CIO, Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers & Contractors Training Fund of Eastern Missouri, Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the St. Louis Vacation Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis, Construction Laborers and Contractors Training Fund of Eastern Missouri, Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union Nos. 42-110, St. Louis Vacation Fund Process Server: Frederick Investigations (Martin, Janine) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-10115803, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Board of Trustees of the St. Louis Vacation Fund, AFL-CIO, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis, Construction Laborers and Contractors Training Fund of Eastern Missouri, Local Union Nos. 42-110, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers & Contractors Training Fund of Eastern Missouri, Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis, Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Laborers International Union of North America, St. Louis Vacation Fund. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Martin, Janine) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Chief U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Clark. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney Janine M. Martin. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
