Henderson v. Festus, City of et al
| Alfred L. Henderson |
| Festus, City of, Festus Police Department, Officer Lewis Pippin, Officer Steven Schilling, Officer Ben Drummond, Officer Wayne Casey, John Doe and John Doe Festus Officer |
| 4:2023cv01048 |
| August 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Rodney H Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Letter from Clerk sent to Plaintiff Alfred L. Henderson re: Failure to file Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 10/21/2023. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice Regarding Magistrate Jurisdiction) (HMA) |
Filing 14
Docket Text ORDER: Re #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) filed by Defendants Officer Ben Drummond, Officer Lewis Pippin; ORDERED DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rodney H. Holmes on 10/11/2023. (HMA)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER (See Full Order). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that attorney Samuel Henderson's Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. (ECF No. #8 ) Plaintiff Alfred Henderson shall proceed pro se unless and until he retains another attorney. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Alfred Henderson shall file a memorandum in opposition to Defendant City of Festus's Motion to Dismiss no later than October 25, 2023. Failure to do so may result in the Court ruling on Defendant's unopposed Motion to Dismiss and/or possible dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. (Response to Court due by 10/25/2023.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Rodney H. Holmes on 10/11/2023. (HMA)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 13, 14 . copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Wed Oct 11 12:42:32 CDT 2023 (Aubuchon, Heather)
|
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM re #11 Order,,, RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Defendants Officer Ben Drummond, Festus, City of, Officer Lewis Pippin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex I - Proof of Delivery, #2 Exhibit Ex II - Rule 11(a) correspondence to Plaintiff, #3 Exhibit Ex III - USPS Tracking Receipt)(Hill, Blake) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants City of Festus, Pippin, and Drummond shall carefully review the file in this case and promptly correct any inadvertent errors in service. Defendants shall verify that Plaintiff Alfred L. Henderson has been served or will be served with all filings in this case. Defendants shall file proof of service that accurately reflects the date or dates on which each filing was mailed to Plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to Plaintiff a copy of Attorney Samuel Henderson's Motion to Withdraw at Doc. No. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a response to Attorney Samuel Henderson's Motion to Withdraw no later than September 29, 2023. (Response to Court due by 9/29/2023) Signed by Magistrate Judge Rodney H. Holmes on 8/30/2023. (HMA)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 8, 11. copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Wed Aug 30 16:26:17 CDT 2023 (Aubuchon, Heather)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (DEFENDANTS LEWIS PIPPIN AND BEN DRUMMOND JOINT ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES) by Officer Ben Drummond, Officer Lewis Pippin.(Hill, Blake) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) by Defendants Officer Ben Drummond, Officer Lewis Pippin. (Hill, Blake) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Withdraw by Plaintiff Alfred L. Henderson. (Henderson, Samuel) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss City of Festus, Count II, Festus Police Department, all official capacity claims filed by Defendant Festus, City of. (Hill, Blake) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss City of Festus, Count II, Festus Police Department, all official capacity claims by Defendant Festus, City of. (Hill, Blake) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Officer Ben Drummond, Festus, City of, Officer Lewis Pippin Sent To: State Court - Executed (Hill, Blake) |
| Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Rodney H. Holmes. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD) |
| Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Jefferson County Circuit Court, filed by Alfred L. Henderson.(JWD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Officer Ben Drummond, Festus, City of, Officer Lewis Pippin Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Attachment NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF OF FILING OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT, #2 Attachment NOTICE TO STATE COURT OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT)(Hill, Blake) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Petition from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Missouri, case number 23JE-CC00679, with receipt number AMOEDC-10119126, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Officer Ben Drummond, Festus, City of, Officer Lewis Pippin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I - State Court File, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hill, Blake) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
