Lolic v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, et al
| Albin Lolic |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc and Trans Union LLC |
| 4:2023cv01100 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Ronnie L White |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Trans Union LLC, TransUnion, Trans Union Intermediate Holdings, Inc., T. Rowe Price Group, Inc... (Brady, Scott) |
| Filing 19 ENTRY of Appearance by Scott E. Brady for Defendant Trans Union LLC. (Brady, Scott) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint by Equifax Information Services, LLC.(St. Onge, Britton) |
Filing 17
Docket Text Order Re: ECF No. #15 , Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer; ORDERED GRANTED. Defendant Trans Union LLC shall have up to and including November 2, 2023, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on October 19, 2023. (LTR)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer for Defendant Trans Union to file an answer filed by Plaintiff Albin Lolic. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: The attorney's signature on the signature block must match the name of the e-filer. This is an informational notice and no further action is needed at this time. All future filings must be in compliance with this rule. (BRP) |
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer for Defendant Trans Union to file an answer by Plaintiff Albin Lolic. (Cook, Matthew) |
|
Filing 14
Docket Text ORDER Re: ECF No. #9 , Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC; ORDERED GRANTED. Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC shall have up to and including October 20, 2023, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Petition. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on September 11, 2023. (LTR)
|
|
Filing 13
Docket Text ORDER Re: ECF No. #12 , MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, filed by Jolena M. Zabel; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on September 11, 2023. (LTR)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Jolena M. Zabel. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-10150699) by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Zabel, Jolena) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.(James, G.) |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Equifax Information Services, LLC, Equifax, Inc... (St. Onge, Britton) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (St. Onge, Britton) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Britton Laurence St. Onge for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (St. Onge, Britton) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Justin M Baxter for Plaintiff Albin Lolic. (Baxter, Justin) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Experian Information Solutions, Inc, Experian plc, Central Source LLC, Online Data Exchange LLC, New Management Services LLC, VantageScore Solutions LLC, Opt-Out Services LLC.. (James, G.) Modified on 9/1/2023 (CBL). |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Ronnie L. White. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
| Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Albin Lolic.(JWD) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Experian Information Solutions, Inc, Experian plc.. (James, G.) Modified on 9/1/2023 (JWD). [Clerk's note: Filer re-filed this Disclosure Statement in CM/ECF to include all corporate affiliates in the docket text as Docket Entry #6 ]. |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal Petition,. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Disclosure Statement not filed as separate docket entry or on the court provided form as now required by Local Rule 2.09 Disclosure Statement. This deficiency must be filed in the case record immediately. (JWD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Ad Litem Experian Information Solutions, Inc Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Filing, #2 Exhibit B - Mailing)(James, G.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis County, case number 23SL-CC03240, with receipt number AMOEDC-10137760, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Filings, #2 Exhibit B - Consent, #3 Exhibit C - Consent, #4 Exhibit D - Civil Coversheet, #5 Exhibit E - Filing Form, #6 Exhibit F - Corporate Disclosure)(James, G.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
