Davis v. Delhaven Manor No. 2
| Leameal Davis |
| Delhaven Manor No. 2 and Delhaven Manor No. 2 doing business as Delhaven Manor |
| 4:2023cv01108 |
| September 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Rodney W Sippel |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Delhaven Manor No. 2. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Tomaso, Robert) |
| Filing 14 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Defendant Delhaven Manor No. 2. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (ANP) |
| Filing 13 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Delhaven Manor No. 2. (Tomaso, Robert) filed by Delhaven Manor No. 2; ORDERED GRANTED Delhaven Manor No. 2 answer due 11/16/2023. Signed by Sr. District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 10/18/2023. (KEK) |
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Delhaven Manor No. 2. (Tomaso, Robert) |
| Filing 11 REASSIGNMENT ORDER (GJL). To avoid any potential appearance of impropriety, Judge Matthew T. Schelp disqualifies himself from this case. Therefore, the case is being randomly reassigned to a different judge. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above styled cause is randomly reassigned to the Honorable Rodney W. Sippel. (KXS) |
| Filing 10 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Defendant Delhaven Manor No. 2. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (TMT) |
| Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert J. Tomaso for Defendant Delhaven Manor No. 2. (Tomaso, Robert) |
Filing 8
Docket Text ORDER Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice D. Wes Sullenger. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-10140283) by Plaintiff Leameal Davis. (Sullenger, D.); ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 9/7/2023. (BRP)
|
| Filing 7 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, a request has been received for random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above styled cause is randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Stephen R. Welby to District Judge Matthew T. Schelp for all further proceedings. (CBL) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE Original Filing Form: by Plaintiff Leameal Davis re 3 Electronic Notice of Filing Deficiency, (Sullenger, D.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Leameal Davis Process Server: Ferrell Court Services (Sullenger, D.) |
| Filing 4 FINAL NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint,. The filing deficiency previously identified has not been corrected by the filing attorney. Case to proceed to judge assignment and further review by the Clerks Office Exec. Team. (JWD) Modified on 9/6/2023 (JWD). [Clerk's note: Deficiency corrected on 9/6/2023.] |
| Summons Issued as to defendant Delhaven Manor No. 2. The summons was emailed to attorney D. Wes Sullenger. (JWD) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Welby. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint,. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Original Filing Form not filed. Notice of Process Server not filed. This deficiency must be filed in the case record immediately. (JWD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice D. Wes Sullenger. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-10140283) by Plaintiff Leameal Davis. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing Certificate of Good Standing)(Sullenger, D.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Delhaven Manor No. 2 with receipt number AMOEDC-10140259, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Leameal Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - EEOC Charge, #2 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter Ex. B, #3 Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sullenger, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
