Curtis v. Insurance Company Aetna et al
| Dustin Patrick Curtis |
| Insurance Company Aetna, Saint Charles County Correctional Center Dept of Corrections, State of Missouri, City of Saint Charles, MO, Missouri Dept of Corrections, Saint Charles County, MO, All Insurance Companies That Cover All Defendants Here Stated and Kiosk |
| 4:2023cv01150 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Ronnie L White |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER of USCA as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Dustin Patrick Curtis USCA Appeal #: 23-3321 If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. (KXS)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER of USCA as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Dustin Patrick Curtis USCA Appeal #: 23-3321 The district court has determined that Appellant has three "strikes" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due November 17, 2023. (KXS)
|
| Filing 9 Initial Notification from USCA for #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Dustin Patrick Curtis USCA Appeal Number: 23-3321(KXS) |
| Filing 8 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by clerk to USCA regarding #2 Memorandum & Order, #3 Order of Dismissal (case - Stipulation of Dismissal),. Notice of Appeal filed on 10/10/2023 by Plaintiff Dustin Patrick Curtis. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTY: FILE REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT WITH DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OFFICE.(JBH) |
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. #6 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file any future documents or pleadings in connection with this appeal directly with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on October 11, 2023. (BRP)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 7. Sent to non-electronic party this date. Wed Oct 11 14:38:18 CDT 2023 (Porter, Brittany)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on appeal under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Dustin Patrick Curtis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TMT) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #2 Memorandum & Order, #3 Order of Dismissal (case - Stipulation of Dismissal), by Plaintiff Dustin Patrick Curtis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TMT) |
| Filing 4 Letter from Clerk sent to pro-se prisoner re:FRAP - all procedures for filing Notice of Appeal (copy of motion to proceed IFP on appeal attached and mailed) (BRP) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: In accordance with the Memorandum and Order of this date and incorporated herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling the Complaint upon payment of the $402 filing fee. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on September 18, 2023. (BRP)
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling the Complaint upon payment of the $402 filing fee. A separate order of dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on September 18, 2023. (BRP)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 2,3,4. Sent to non-electronic party this date. Mon Sep 18 15:16:08 CDT 2023 (Porter, Brittany)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, Jury Demand,, filed by Dustin Patrick Curtis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Grievance Documents, #2 Cover Sheet - "2 of 3", #3 Correspondence, #4 Envelope)(JWD) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Ronnie L. White. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Sep 14 15:01:21 CDT 2023 (admin,) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
