Sherrion v. Adams
Petitioner: Michael Ray Sherrion
Respondent: Richard Adams
Case Number: 4:2023cv01204
Filed: September 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Rodney H Holmes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Letter from Clerk sent to pro-se prisoner re:FRAP - all procedures for filing Notice of Appeal. (copy of motion to proceed IFP on appeal attached and mailed) (JEB)
October 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Order dated September 27, 2023, requiring plaintiff to amend his complaint on a court- provided form. As a result, this action is dismissed for failure to comply with a court Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/30/2023. (JEB)
October 30, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Mon Oct 30 12:39:12 CDT 2023 (Bailey, Jennifer)
October 30, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6, 7. Copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Mon Oct 30 12:43:34 CDT 2023 (Bailey, Jennifer)
October 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. #2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $1.00 within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail plaintiff a blank copy of the Court's Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on the Court-provided form and in compliance with the Court's instructions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon submission of the amended complaint, the Court shall again review this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Plaintiff's failure to timely comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice. (Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 10/18/2023. Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 10/18/2023.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 9/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form)(JEB)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order ***REMARK: [REMARK DOCKETED IN THIS CASE IN ERROR. NEF REGENERATED TO PARTIES.] ORIGINAL DOCKET TEXT REMOVED. (JWD)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Wed Sep 27 14:27:33 CDT 2023 (Bailey, Jennifer)
September 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Rodney H. Holmes. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD)
September 26, 2023 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
September 26, 2023 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Sep 26 10:02:20 CDT 2023 (admin,)
September 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Inmate Account Statement by Petitioner Michael Ray Sherrion. (JWD)
September 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Michael Ray Sherrion. (JWD)
September 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Michael Ray Sherrion. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(JWD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sherrion v. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Ray Sherrion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Richard Adams
Represented By: Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?