Hydromat, Inc. v. GMI Corporation
| Hydromat, Inc. |
| GMI Corporation |
| 4:2023cv01254 |
| October 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: two [SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS]. ( Joint Scheduling Plan due by 12/18/2023. Rule 16 Conference set for 12/21/2023 11:00 AM in Courtroom 14S - St. Louis before District Judge Matthew T. Schelp.) Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 12/05/2023. (KCD)
|
| Filing 14 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint and COUNTERCLAIM against plaintiff Hydromat, Inc. by GMI Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Counterclaim - Buyback Program, #2 Exhibit B to Counterclaim - Formal Proposal, #3 Exhibit C to Counterclaim - Purchase Order)(Schultz, Jeffrey) Modified on 11/30/2023 (TMT). |
|
Filing 13
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time, Doc. #12 is GRANTED. Defendant has until November 29, 2023 to file its responsive pleading or provide a status update on settlement. (GMI Corporation answer due 11/29/2023.) Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 11/6/2023. (BRP)
|
| Filing 12 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Consent by Defendant GMI Corporation. (Schultz, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hydromat, Inc.. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Haith, Barry) |
|
Filing 10
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading, Doc. #6 , is GRANTED. Defendant has through November 8, 2023 to file its responsive pleading. (GMI Corporation answer due 11/8/2023.) Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 10/11/2023. (TMT)
|
| Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Jacob Richard Schlueter for Plaintiff Hydromat, Inc.. (Schlueter, Jacob) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant GMI Corporation Sent To: State Court - Executed (Schultz, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Abigail Leigh Twenter for Defendant GMI Corporation. (Twenter, Abigail) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Defendant GMI Corporation. (Schultz, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Plaintiff Hydromat, Inc.. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (TMT) |
| Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Hydromat, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(JWD) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by GMI Corporation. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Schultz, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant GMI Corporation Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Removal)(Schultz, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County Circuit Court, case number 23SL-CC03556, with receipt number AMOEDC-10199733, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by GMI Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Filings, #2 Exhibit B - Original Filing Form, #3 Exhibit C - Civil Cover Sheet)(Schultz, Jeffrey) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Matthew T. Schelp. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hydromat, Inc. v. GMI Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hydromat, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Barry L. Haith |
| Represented By: | Jacob Richard Schlueter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GMI Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey L. Schultz |
| Represented By: | Abigail Leigh Twenter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
