Bayer CropScience LP et al v. Calder
| Bayer CropScience LP and Monsanto Technology LLC |
| Jimmy B. Calder, Calder Farms and Jimmy B. Calder doing business as Jimmy Calder, Calder Farms |
| 4:2023cv01417 |
| November 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Sarah E Pitlyk |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 EXHIBITS from Declaration of Glenn Pace, Jr. (ecf #5 -2) by Plaintiffs Bayer CropScience LP, Monsanto Technology LLC; the Court received and reviewed on 11/7/23.(NEP) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY (no pdf attached) for proceedings held before District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk: Motion Hearing held on 11/7/2023 re #5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Monsanto Technology LLC, Bayer CropScience LP. This motion hearing was held Ex Parte with Plaintiff Counsel only. Arguments heard and evidence received. The Court will GRANT Plaintiff's Motion for TRO. Order to issue. (Court Reporter:Kristine Toennies, Kristine_Toennies@moed.uscourts.gov, 314-244-6701) (proceedings started: 12:10) (proceedings ended: 12:45) (Deputy Clerk: NEP)(Appearance for Plaintiff: Don Cox and Kevin Foley) (NEP) |
Filing 8
Docket Text ORDER: This matter is set for a TRO Hearing today, November 7, 2023, at 12:00 PM in the courtroom of the undersigned. (Hearing on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order set for 11/7/2023 12:00 PM in Courtroom 16N - St. Louis before District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk.) Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 11/7/2023. (AFO)
|
| Filing 7 REPORT to Commissioner of filing or determination of an action regarding patent. (JWD) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney Daniel Cox. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE REQUESTING HEARING ON TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER re #5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiffs Bayer CropScience LP, Monsanto Technology LLC. (Cox, Daniel) Modified on 11/7/2023 to correct filing event used (JWD). |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiffs Bayer CropScience LP, Monsanto Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Supporting Memo, #2 Exhibit 1-Pace Declaration, #3 Exhibit 2-Discovery Requests, #4 Exhibit 3-Letter, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Cox, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer AG.. (Cox, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Monsanto Technology LLC, Bayer AG.. (Cox, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs Bayer CropScience LP, Monsanto Technology LLC Process Server: Glenn Pace, Jr. (Cox, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Jimmy B. Calder, Calder Farms with receipt number AMOEDC-10257577, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Bayer CropScience LP, Monsanto Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Patent 9944945, #2 Exhibit B-Patent 7838729, #3 Exhibit C-TSA, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Original Filing Form, #6 Summons)(Cox, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
