Hayden et al v. Monsanto Company et al
| Mr. Thomas Hayden, Wanda Hayden and Thomas Hayden |
| Monsanto Company, Eastman Chemical Company, Pharmacia LLC, Shell USA, Inc., Individually and as successor to Shell Oil Company, Incorporated, Shell Chemical LP (f/k/a Shell Chemical Company), Shell Oil Products Company, LLC, Solutia Inc., Shell USA, Inc. and Solutia, Inc. |
| 4:2023cv01542 |
| December 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 48 REPLY to Response to Motion re #40 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to City of St. Louis, Missouri, 22nd Judicial Circuit filed by Plaintiffs Thomas Hayden, Wanda Hayden. (Dysart, Christopher) |
| Filing 47 Docket Text ORDER: The Court grants #46 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Plaintiffs' First Amended Petition by Plaintiffs Thomas Hayden, Wanda Hayden. (Dysart, Christopher). (Response to Court due by 2/20/2024.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 1/19/2024. (CLT) |
| Filing 46 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Plaintiffs' First Amended Petition by Plaintiffs Thomas Hayden, Wanda Hayden. (Dysart, Christopher) |
| Filing 45 Docket Text ORDER: Having reviewed both Defendant Shell USA, Inc.'s #35 Response to the Court's 33 Show-Cause Order and Shell USA's #44 Amended Disclosure Statement, the Court discharges its Order and deems Shell USA's #31 Answer properly filed. Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 1/16/24. (JAB) |
| Filing 44 AMENDED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Shell USA, Inc., Shell Petroleum Inc, Shell plc, Brazos Wind Holdings LLC, Infineum USA Inc, SCOGI GP, Shell (US) Gas & Power M&T Holdings Inc, Shell Chemical LP, Shell Information Technology International Inc, Shell Nanhai Limted. (Korn, Richard) Modified on 1/16/2024 (CBL). |
| Filing 43 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #40 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to City of St. Louis, Missouri, 22nd Judicial Circuit filed by Defendants Eastman Chemical Company, Monsanto Company, Pharmacia LLC, Solutia, Inc.. (Hopkins, Bryan) |
| Filing 42 ENTRY of Appearance by Ryan E. Mohr for Defendant Shell USA, Inc.. (Mohr, Ryan) |
| Filing 41 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #40 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to City of St. Louis, Missouri, 22nd Judicial Circuit filed by Plaintiffs Thomas Hayden, Wanda Hayden. (Dysart, Christopher) |
| Filing 40 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to City of St. Louis, Missouri, 22nd Judicial Circuit by Plaintiffs Thomas Hayden, Wanda Hayden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1. Distribution Agreement.pdf, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2, Declaration Jeffrey Quinn.pdf, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3, Assignment and Assumption Agreement.pdf, #4 Exhibit Ex. 4, Separation Agreement Pharmacia and Monsanto Company.pdf, #5 Exhibit Ex. 4A., July 1, 2002 Amendment Separation Agreement.pdf, #6 Exhibit Ex. 5, 2002 Amendment Distribution Agreement.pdf, #7 Exhibit Ex. 6, Memo in Support Solutia Motion Approval Settlement June 29, 2007.pdf, #8 Exhibit Ex. 7, Supplemental Memo in Support Global Settlement.pdf, #9 Exhibit Ex. 8, Dft Solutia-Monsanto Settlement Agreement dtd 10.15.2007.pdf, #10 Exhibit Ex. 9, Order Bankruptcy and Reorganization Plan.pdf, #11 Exhibit Ex. 10, Depo Pharmacia.pdf, #12 Exhibit Ex. 11, Form 10-K.pdf)(Dysart, Christopher) |
| Filing 39 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #36 Entry of Appearance filed by Defendant Shell USA, Inc.. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: The attorney's signature on the signature block must match the name of the e-filer. Attorney Mohr must re-file an Entry of Appearance using his CM/ECF account. All future filings must be in compliance with this rule. (CLT) |
| Filing 38 Docket Text ORDER: The Court grants Shell USA, Inc's #37 Motion for extension of time and extends the deadline for Shell USA, Inc. to file its disclosure statement to January 12, 2024. The Court does not anticipate granting further extensions. (Response to Court due by 1/12/2024.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 12/26/2023. (CLT) |
| Filing 37 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Corporate Disclosure Statement; proposed extension date 1/12/24 by Defendant Shell USA, Inc. (Korn, Richard) Modified on 12/26/2023 (CLT). |
| Filing 36 ENTRY of Appearance by Richard B. Korn for Defendant Shell USA, Inc.. (Korn, Richard) |
| Filing 35 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Regarding its Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint and Corporate Disclosures by Defendant Shell USA, Inc. filed by Defendant Shell USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Showing Date of Service, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B Showing Date of Initial Filing of Answer in State Court)(Korn, Richard) |
| Filing 34 Docket Text ORDER: The Court grants #32 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. (Response to Court due by 1/21/2024.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 12/21/2023. (CLT) |
| Filing 33 Docket Text ORDER: Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81(c)(2), Defendant Shell USA, Inc.'s answer or response was due no later than December 8, 2023. Shell USA, Inc., however, filed its #31 Answer on December 13, 2023. Doc. 31. Accordingly, the Court orders Shell USA, Inc. to show cause, in writing no later than December 29, 2023, why the Court should not strike its answer as untimely. The Court also orders Shell to file, by the same date, the disclosure statement required by this Court's Local Rules. See doc. 30. (Show Cause Response due by 12/29/2023.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 12/20/2023. (CLT) |
| Filing 32 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Plaintiffs' First Amended Petition by Plaintiffs Thomas Hayden, Wanda Hayden. (Dysart, Christopher) |
| Filing 31 ANSWER to Complaint by Shell USA, Inc..(Korn, Richard) |
| Filing 30 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #29 Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Shell USA, Inc.. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Party filed the Disclosure Statement in this action in which jurisdiction is based on diversity under 28 U.S.C.1332(a) but, did not identify the name and citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor, including all members, sub-members, general and limited partners, and corporations. Please review Local Rule 2.09, which was revised in March 2023 and use the revised form adopted by this Court - MOED0001, which is available on the website. The party's state of incorporation/formation and principal state of business must be disclosed in section 2. The Disclosure Statement must be refiled. (CBL) |
| Filing 29 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Shell USA, Inc., Shell Petroleum, Inc., Shell plc.. (Korn, Richard) |
| Filing 28 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Defendant Shell USA, Inc.. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (LNJ) |
| Filing 27 ENTRY of Appearance by Jaylen Henderson for Defendant Shell USA, Inc.. (Henderson, Jaylen) |
| Filing 26 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant Shell USA, Inc.. (Korn, Richard) |
| Filing 25 ENTRY of Appearance by Richard B. Korn for Defendant Shell USA, Inc.. (Korn, Richard) |
| Filing 24 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Plaintiffs' First Amended Petition filed by Defendant Eastman Chemical Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Edwin Williamson)(Hopkins, Bryan) |
| Filing 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Plaintiffs' First Amended Petition by Defendant Eastman Chemical Company. (Hopkins, Bryan) |
| Filing 22 Solutia Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiffs' First Amended Petition by Solutia, Inc..(Hopkins, Bryan) |
| Filing 21 Monsanto Company's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiffs' First Amended Petition by Monsanto Company.(Hopkins, Bryan) |
| Filing 20 AMENDED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Solutia, Inc., Eastman Chemical Company, Eastman International Holdings, LLC, Eastman Chemical, Ltd... (Hopkins, Bryan) Modified on 12/8/2023 (KXS). |
| Filing 19 AMENDED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wanda Hayden. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Dysart, Christopher) Modified on 12/8/2023 (KXS). |
| Filing 18 AMENDED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Thomas Hayden. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Dysart, Christopher) Modified on 12/8/2023 (KXS). |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #13 Disclosure Statement, #12 Disclosure Statement filed by Plaintiffs Thomas Hayden, Wanda Hayden. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Party filed the Disclosure Statement in this action in which jurisdiction is based on diversity under 28 U.S.C.1332(a) but, did not identify the name and citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor, including all members, sub-members, general and limited partners, and corporations. This case was removed on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Please complete section 2 of the form with plaintiff's state of citizenship. The Disclosure Statement must be refiled. (CBL) |
| ***REMARK - NOTICE OF FILING DEFICIENCY - Docket # 9 entered in error and has been deleted. No action required. There will be no document 9 in this case. (CBL) |
| Filing 16 REASSIGNMENT ORDER (GJL). District Judge Ronnie L. White no longer assigned to case. Case reassigned to Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark for all further proceedings. (KCD) |
Filing 15
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is transmitted to the Clerk of the Court for random reassignment. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 12/5/2023. (TMT)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Eastman Chemical Company, Monsanto Company, Pharmacia LLC, Solutia, Inc. Sent To: State Court - Executed (Hopkins, Bryan) |
| Filing 13 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wanda Hayden. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Dysart, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Thomas Hayden. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Dysart, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 First Amended Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, filed by Thomas Hayden, Wanda Hayden.(JWD) |
| Filing 10 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, filed by Thomas Hayden, Wanda Hayden.(JWD) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Ronnie L. White. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Eastman Chemical Company, Monsanto Company, Pharmacia LLC, Solutia Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Black, Brandon) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Brandon A Black for Defendants Eastman Chemical Company, Monsanto Company, Pharmacia LLC, Solutia Inc.. (Black, Brandon) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiffs' First Amended Petition by Pharmacia LLC.(Hopkins, Bryan) |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Solutia Inc., Eastman Chemical Company, Eastman International Holdings, LLC, Eastman Chemical, Ltd... (Hopkins, Bryan) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Pharmacia LLC, Pfizer Inc... (Hopkins, Bryan) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Monsanto Company, Bayer AG.. (Hopkins, Bryan) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Eastman Chemical Company, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A... (Hopkins, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis City, case number 2322-CC09433, with receipt number AMOEDC-10302715, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Monsanto Company, Solutia Inc., Eastman Chemical Company, Pharmacia LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Exhibit A - First Amended Petition, #4 Exhibit B - Petition, #5 Exhibit C - Summons Served on Solutia and Monsanto, #6 Exhibit D - Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File First Amended Petition, #7 Exhibit E - Order Granting Motion to File First Amended Petition, #8 Exhibit F - Declaration of Keith Abrams re Monsanto Company, #9 Exhibit G - Declaration of Edwin Williamson re Solutia, #10 Exhibit H - State Court File, #11 Exhibit I - Consents to Removal)(Hopkins, Bryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
