McCauley v. RWR Enterprises, Inc.
| Maryanne McCauley |
| RWR Enterprises, Inc. |
| 4:2023cv01646 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Catherine D Perry |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Roger W. Pecha for Defendant RWR Enterprises, Inc.. (Pecha, Roger) |
Filing 7
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all pending motions are denied withoutprejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall file, within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, a stipulation for dismissal, a motion for leave to voluntarily dismiss, or a proposed consent judgment. Failure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. (Dismissal Paper(s) due by 3/8/2024.) Signed by Sr. District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 02/07/2024. (KRZ)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by Maryanne McCauley (Schapiro, Douglas) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Maryanne McCauley RWR Enterprises, Inc. waiver signed on 12/19/2023, answer due 2/20/2024. (Schapiro, Douglas) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Helen Farnan Carpenter for Defendant RWR Enterprises, Inc.. (Carpenter, Helen) |
| Filing 3 Filed under the incorrect PACER account - ENTRY of Appearance by Helen Farnan Carpenter for Defendant RWR Enterprises, Inc. (Carpenter, Helen) Modified on 2/7/2024 (KRZ). |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Catherine D. Perry. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney Douglas Schapiro. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Maryanne McCauley Process Server: SRI Process (Schapiro, Douglas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant RWR Enterprises, Inc. with receipt number AMOEDC-10334343, in the amount of $405 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Maryanne McCauley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt, #2 Exhibit Selfie, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Original Filing Form)(Schapiro, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McCauley v. RWR Enterprises, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maryanne McCauley | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Schapiro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RWR Enterprises, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Helen Farnan Carpenter |
| Represented By: | Roger W. Pecha |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
