Buckley v. Moloney Securities Co., Inc.
| James Buckley |
| Moloney Securities Co., Inc. |
| 4:2024cv00033 |
| January 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Ronnie L White |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Moloney Securities Co., Inc.. (Turner, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Moloney Securities Co., Inc.. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Turner, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 ENTRY of Appearance by Matthew D. Turner for Defendant Moloney Securities Co., Inc.. (Turner, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 CJRA ORDER (NMG). Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, a request has been received for random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above styled cause is randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Stephen R. Welby to District Judge Ronnie L. White for all further proceedings. (CBL) |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by James Buckley. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Dameron, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Plaintiff James Buckley. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every party, including individuals, or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Individual parties must list their name and state of citizenship in Section 2. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (CBL) |
| Notice from Clerk instructing Plaintiff James Buckley to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 1/31/2024. (CBL) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Matthew L. Dameron for Plaintiff James Buckley. (Dameron, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by James Buckley Moloney Securities Co., Inc. waiver signed on 1/9/2024, answer due 3/11/2024. (Dirks, Eric) |
| Filing 6 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff James Buckley Process Server: HPS Process Service and Investigations (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Dirks, Eric) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint, Original Filing Form by Plaintiff James Buckley. (Dirks, Eric) |
| Filing 3 FINAL NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint. The filing deficiency previously identified has not been corrected by the filing attorney. Case to proceed to judge assignment and further review by the Clerks Office Exec. Team. (JWD) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Welby. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint,. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Original Filing Form not filed. Notice of Process Server and Completed Summons or Request for Waiver of Service not filed. This deficiency must be filed in the case record immediately. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Moloney Securities Co., Inc. with receipt number AMOEDC-10364626, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by James Buckley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dirks, Eric) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/8/2024 due to fillable PDF error) (JWD). Modified on 1/8/2024 (JWD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Buckley v. Moloney Securities Co., Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Buckley | |
| Represented By: | Eric L. Dirks |
| Represented By: | Matthew L. Dameron |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Moloney Securities Co., Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew D. Turner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
