Guerrero v. Henkel Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Alexander Guerrero
Defendant: Henkel Corporation and Does 1 through 10
Case Number: 4:2024cv00057
Filed: January 10, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Clark
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2024 Filing 22 Docket Text ORDER: The Court orders the parties to review and comply with the undersigned's Judge's Requirements, located on the Eastern District of Missouri's court website: #Chief Judge Stephen R. Clark's Requirements. The undersigned periodically updates his Judge's Requirements, and the parties must ensure that they are complying with the most recent version before filing any document. Failure to comply with the requirements may result in the imposition of "sanction[s] or other disadvantage." Fed. R. Civ. P. 83(b). Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 3/6/2024. (KXS)
February 29, 2024 Filing 21 REPLY to Response to Motion re #18 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Henkel Corporation. (Jente, Michael)
February 23, 2024 Filing 20 RESPONSE in Opposition re #18 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff Alexander Guerrero. (Harvath, Daniel)
February 16, 2024 Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #18 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Henkel Corporation. (Jente, Michael)
February 16, 2024 Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Henkel Corporation. (Jente, Michael)
February 13, 2024 Filing 17 Docket Text ORDER: The Court orders the parties to review and comply with the undersigned's Judge's Requirements, located on the Eastern District of Missouri's court website. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the imposition of "sanction[s] or other disadvantage." Fed. R. Civ. P. 83(b). Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 2/13/2024. (CLH)
January 29, 2024 Filing 16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Alexander Guerrero. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Harvath, Daniel)
January 29, 2024 Filing 15 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Plaintiff Alexander Guerrero - SECOND NOTICE. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (CLT)
January 25, 2024 Filing 14 MEMORANDUM re #11 Order,, Joint Memorandum by Defendant Henkel Corporation. (Goerisch, C.)
January 16, 2024 Filing 13 Docket Text ORDER: The Court grants #12 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond. Any response to the Complaint must be filed no later than February 16, 2024. (Henkel Corporation answer due 2/16/2024.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 1/16/2024. (CLT)
January 12, 2024 Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Defendant Henkel Corporation. (Jente, Michael)
January 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: No later than January 25, 2024, the parties must jointly submit a memorandum explaining the parties' respective positions on whether Boren states claims for relief under applicable law, including Abbott and Bell, and whether the parties will stipulate to the dismissal of the case on the merits while reserving all rights to appeal. (Response to Court due by 1/25/2024.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 1/11/2024. (LNJ) (Main Document 11 replaced on 1/12/2024 to correct case number) (JAB).
January 11, 2024 Filing 10 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins termed. Case reassigned to Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark for all further proceedings. (TMT)
January 11, 2024 Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by August Horvath for Defendant Henkel Corporation. (Horvath, August)
January 11, 2024 Filing 8 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, filed by Alexander Guerrero.(JBH)
January 11, 2024 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH)
January 10, 2024 Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Kolten Charles Ellis for Defendant Henkel Corporation. (Ellis, Kolten)
January 10, 2024 Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by C. David Goerisch for Defendant Henkel Corporation. (Goerisch, C.)
January 10, 2024 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Henkel Corporation, Henkel Consumer Goods Inc., Henkel US Operations Corporation, Henkel of America, Inc., Henkel of America I LLC, Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Henkel AG & Co. KGaA.. (Jente, Michael)
January 10, 2024 Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael L. Jente for Defendant Henkel Corporation. (Jente, Michael)
January 10, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Henkel Corporation Sent To: State Court - Executed (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice to State Clerk of Removal, #2 Exhibit 2 - efiling confirmation)(Jente, Michael)
January 10, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Henkel Corporation Sent To: Plaintiff (Jente, Michael)
January 10, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County Circuit Court, case number 23SL-CC05176, with receipt number AMOEDC-10370871, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by Henkel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Salma Omai, #2 Exhibit B - State Court File, #3 Exhibit C - Original Filing Form, #4 Exhibit D - Civil Cover Sheet)(Jente, Michael) (Attachment 4 replaced on 1/10/2024 due to fillable PDF error) (JWD). Modified on 1/10/2024 (JWD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guerrero v. Henkel Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexander Guerrero
Represented By: Daniel F. Harvath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Henkel Corporation
Represented By: C. David Goerisch
Represented By: Kolten Charles Ellis
Represented By: Michael L. Jente
Represented By: August Horvath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?