Castello v. Sudora, LLC et al
| Cecilia A. Castello |
| Sudora, LLC doing business as Sudora Computer Services and Robert Charles Meyers, Jr. |
| 4:2024cv00205 |
| February 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Noelle C Collins |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' unopposed Motion for Leave to File Out of Time, Doc. #8 , is GRANTED. Defendants shall file their responsive pleading(s) no later than Monday, April 08, 2024. (Answer due 04/08/2024). Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 04/01/2024. (KCD)
|
| Filing 9 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Defendant Sudora, LLC. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (TMT) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File Their Responsive Pleading Out of Time by Defendants Robert Charles Meyers, Jr., Sudora, LLC. (Luce, David) Modified on 3/27/2024 (TMT). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Cecilia A. Castello. Sudora, LLC served on 3/4/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. (Oliphant, Philip) Modified on 3/8/2024 (KCD). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Cecilia A. Castello. Robert Charles Meyer, Jr served on 3/4/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. (Oliphant, Philip) Modified on 3/8/2024 (KCD). |
| Filing 5 CJRA ORDER (NMG). Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Matthew T. Schelp for all further proceedings. (TMT) |
| Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Cecilia Castello Process Server: Tim Moore/Pro Serve (Attachments: #1 Intent to Use Process Server)(Oliphant, Philip) |
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Cecilia Castello. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form)(Oliphant, Philip) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-10429571, in the amount of $405 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Cecilia Castello. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Oliphant, Philip) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. 2 Summons(es) issued and emailed to Philip Oliphant. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
