Carter v. Loves Travel Stops & Country Stores #341 et al
| Daniel M. Carter |
| Loves Travel Stops & Country Stores #341, Grace Morales, Josh Jones and John Doe |
| 4:2024cv00242 |
| February 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Noelle C Collins |
| Sarah E Pitlyk |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CJRA ORDER (NMG). Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk for all further proceedings (BRP) |
| Filing 6 Letter from Clerk sent to Plaintiff Daniel M. Carter re: Failure to file Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 4/4/2024. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction) (TMT) (Main Document 6 replaced on 3/21/2024 to correct deadline in correspondence) (TMT). Modified on 3/21/2024 (TMT). |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Thu Mar 21 11:04:58 CDT 2024 (Tillman, Tiffani)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Thu Mar 21 11:12:08 CDT 2024 (Tillman, Tiffani)
|
| Filing 5 EXHIBITS Received: Three (3) CD/DVD by Plaintiff Daniel M. Carter. Exhibits will be maintained in the Clerk's Office. (TMT) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Daniel M. Carter. (KCD) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Daniel M. Carter. (KCD) |
| Filing 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Feb 15 15:01:53 CST 2024 (admin,) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, Jury Demand, filed by Daniel M. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A - Loves Travel Stops Receipts & Work Order, #3 Exhibit B - Rolla Police Department Report, #4 Exhibit C - JX Truck Center (PETERBILT), #5 Exhibit D - State of Missouri Attorney General Office Report, #6 Exhibit E - Big Boy Towing & Recovery, #7 Exhibit F - C.H. Robinson (Freight Broker), #8 Exhibit G - Artisan & Truckers Casualty Co. (Progressive Ins.), #9 Waiver of Service Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores #341, #10 Summons Morales, #11 Summons Jones, #12 Summons John Doe 7434, #13 Summons John Doe 3673)(JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
