Ozark MHP, LLC v. City of Arnold, Missouri
Ozark MHP, LLC |
City of Arnold, Missouri |
4:2024cv00248 |
February 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Sarah E Pitlyk |
Constitutional - State Statute |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert K. Sweeney for Defendant City of Arnold, Missouri. (Sweeney, Robert) |
Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Allison M. Sweeney for Defendant City of Arnold, Missouri. (Sweeney, Allison) |
Filing 6 CJRA ORDER (NMG). Magistrate Judge Joseph S. Dueker termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk and District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk for all further proceedings (JMP) |
Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Joseph S. Dueker. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney Brett C. Randol. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM by Plaintiff Ozark MHP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons)(Randol, Brett) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Ozark MHP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form)(Randol, Brett) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Ozark MHP, LLC Process Server: HPS Process and Investigations (Randol, Brett) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant City of Arnold, Missouri with receipt number BMOEDC-10444859, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by Ozark MHP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F)(Randol, Brett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ozark MHP, LLC v. City of Arnold, Missouri | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ozark MHP, LLC | |
Represented By: | Brett Randol |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of Arnold, Missouri | |
Represented By: | Allison M. Sweeney |
Represented By: | Robert K. Sweeney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.