Ozark MHP, LLC v. City of Arnold, Missouri
Plaintiff: Ozark MHP, LLC
Defendant: City of Arnold, Missouri
Case Number: 4:2024cv00248
Filed: February 16, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Sarah E Pitlyk
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2024 Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert K. Sweeney for Defendant City of Arnold, Missouri. (Sweeney, Robert)
March 18, 2024 Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Allison M. Sweeney for Defendant City of Arnold, Missouri. (Sweeney, Allison)
February 26, 2024 Filing 6 CJRA ORDER (NMG). Magistrate Judge Joseph S. Dueker termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk and District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk for all further proceedings (JMP)
February 20, 2024 Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto)
February 20, 2024 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Joseph S. Dueker. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney Brett C. Randol. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD)
February 16, 2024 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM by Plaintiff Ozark MHP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons)(Randol, Brett)
February 16, 2024 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Ozark MHP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form)(Randol, Brett)
February 16, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Ozark MHP, LLC Process Server: HPS Process and Investigations (Randol, Brett)
February 16, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant City of Arnold, Missouri with receipt number BMOEDC-10444859, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by Ozark MHP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F)(Randol, Brett)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ozark MHP, LLC v. City of Arnold, Missouri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ozark MHP, LLC
Represented By: Brett Randol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Arnold, Missouri
Represented By: Allison M. Sweeney
Represented By: Robert K. Sweeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?