Tapley v. Jones et al
| Derek Tapley |
| William Jones, Robert Embly and City of Louisiana |
| 4:2024cv00257 |
| February 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S ORDER (NMG) - Accordingly, the above-styled case is transferred to the Northern Division and assigned to the Honorable Noelle C. Collins, United States Magistrate Judge, under cause number 2:24CV00019 NCC. Cause umber 4:24CV00257 UNA shall be administratively closed. (JBH) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Derek Tapley. (James, John) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Original Filing Form not filed, Notice of Process Server not filed, and Summons not filed. This deficiency must be filed in the case record immediately. (JBH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-10447200, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by Derek Tapley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(James, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
