Roberts v. Panera, LLC
Plaintiff: Cassandra Roberts
Defendant: Panera Bread Company d/b/a Panera Bread, A foreign corporation and Panera, LLC doing business as Panera Bread
Case Number: 4:2024cv00280
Filed: February 22, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: John A Ross
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: Having been advised that a settlement has been reached between Plaintiff Cassandra Roberts and Defendant Panera, LLC d/b/a Panera Bread, (ECF No. #14 ), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all case deadlines are VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall file, within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, a stipulation for dismissal, motion for leave to voluntarily dismiss, or proposed consent judgment as to Defendant Panera, LLC. (Dismissal Paper(s) due by 5/29/2024.) Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 4/1/24. (JAB)
March 29, 2024 Filing 14 NOTICE by Defendant Panera, LLC Joint Notice of Pending Settlement (Christensen, Rebecca)
March 7, 2024 Filing 13 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Panera, LLC Sent To: State Court - Executed (Christensen, Rebecca)
March 7, 2024 Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Panera, LLC, JAB Holding Company.. (Christensen, Rebecca)
March 6, 2024 Filing 11 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Defendant Panera, LLC. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (JAB)
February 28, 2024 Filing 10 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #8 Consent MOTION to Substitute Party by Defendant Panera Bread Company (Christensen, Rebecca); ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 2/28/24. (JAB)
February 28, 2024 Filing 9 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Panera Bread Company (Christensen, Rebecca); ORDERED GRANTED. Panera Bread Company answer due 4/1/2024. Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 2/28/24. (JAB)
February 28, 2024 Filing 8 Consent MOTION to Substitute Party by Defendant Panera Bread Company. (Christensen, Rebecca)
February 28, 2024 Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Panera Bread Company. (Christensen, Rebecca)
February 26, 2024 Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL re #4 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal to Plaintiff by Defendant Panera Bread Company. (Christensen, Rebecca)
February 23, 2024 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable John A. Ross. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD)
February 22, 2024 Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Cassandra Roberts. (Attachments: #1 MCHR Right to Sue Charging Letter, #2 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter)(JWD)
February 22, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Panera Bread Company Sent To: Plaintiff (Christensen, Rebecca)
February 22, 2024 Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Colleen J. Vetter for Defendant Panera Bread Company. (Vetter, Colleen)
February 22, 2024 Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Rebecca M. Christensen for Defendant Panera Bread Company. (Christensen, Rebecca)
February 22, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Twenty-first Circuit Court of St. Louis County, case number 24SL-CC00226, with receipt number AMOEDC-10455065, in the amount of $405 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Panera Bread Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court File, #2 Original Filing Form Filing Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet)(Christensen, Rebecca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberts v. Panera, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cassandra Roberts
Represented By: Joshua G. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Panera Bread Company d/b/a Panera Bread, A foreign corporation
Represented By: Colleen J. Vetter
Represented By: Rebecca M. Christensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Panera, LLC doing business as Panera Bread
Represented By: Rebecca M. Christensen
Represented By: Colleen J. Vetter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?