Harper v. Elsworth et al
| Christopher Louis Harper |
| Lori Elsworth and St. Charles County Department of Correction Jail |
| 4:2024cv00302 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Patricia L Cohen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Letter from Clerk sent to pro-se prisoner re:FRAP - all procedures for filing Notice of Appeal (copy of motion to proceed IFP on appeal attached and mailed). (JEB)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 7, 8, 9. Copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Fri Apr 5 12:03:16 CDT 2024 (Bailey, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. In accordance with the Opinion, Memorandum and Order of this date and incorporated herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 4/4/2024. (JEB)
|
|
Filing 7
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. #2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $17.17 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) the statement that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint because the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both. An Order of Dismissal will accompany this Opinion, Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 4/4/2024. (JEB)
|
|
Filing 6
SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Christopher Louis Harper. (JAB)
|
|
Filing 5
Letter to the Clerk re copies. (JAB) Remark: Copy of doc # 1 and docket sheet mailed to plaintiff.
|
|
Filing 4
Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto)
|
|
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Patricia L. Cohen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Feb 27 12:03:49 CST 2024 (admin,)
|
|
Filing 3
Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Christopher Louis Harper. (JWD)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Christopher Louis Harper. (JWD)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against defendant Lori Elsworth, St. Charles County Department of Correction Jail, Jury Demand, filed by Christopher Louis Harper. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Correspondence, #3 Envelope)(JWD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
