Robinson v. City of St. Louis et al
| Junior Robinson |
| City of St. Louis, Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah, Correctional Officer John Doe 1, Correctional Officer John Doe 2 and Correctional Officer John Doe 3 |
| 4:2024cv00384 |
| March 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Junior Robinson. (Etzkorn, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Junior Robinson (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Etzkorn, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Original Filing Form not filed. Civil Cover Sheet not filed. Notice of Process Server form and Completed Summons or Request for Waiver of Service not filed. This deficiency must be filed in the case record immediately. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants in the amount of $405.00 receipt number AMOEDC-10492813 Jury Demand,, filed by Junior Robinson.(Etzkorn, Kevin) Modified on 3/13/2024 to add receipt information (JWD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
