Schultz v. Walmart, Inc.
| Michael Schultz |
| Walmart, Inc., Walmart Supercenter and Walmart |
| 4:2024cv00472 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Rodney H Holmes |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Alternative Dispute Resolution. This case is referred to: Mediation. Designation of Lead Counsel: Joseph M. Hoffman. ADR Completion Deadline due by 1/6/2025. ADR Compliance Report Deadline due by 1/20/2025. Designation of Neutral/Conference Report due by 11/15/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rodney H. Holmes on 5/14/2024. (HMA)
|
|
Filing 23
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (See Full Order). This case is assigned to Track: 2 (Standard). Motion to Join Parties due by 6/14/2024. Discovery Completion due by 12/20/2024. Non-Dispositive Motions due by 12/31/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 2/3/2025. Pretrial Compliance due by 5/27/2025. Motion in Limine due by 6/6/2025. Jury Trial set for 6/16/2025 09:00 AM in Courtroom 13N - St. Louis before Magistrate Judge Rodney H. Holmes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rodney H. Holmes on 5/14/2024. (HMA)
|
| Filing 22 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY (no pdf attached) for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Rodney H. Holmes:Rule 16 Conference held on 5/14/2024. Conference held in person. Parties discuss deadlines. CMO to issue. (proceedings started: 10:00 am) (proceedings ended: 10:06 am) (Appearance for Plaintiff: Joseph Hoffman)(Appearance for Defendant: Dedra Moore) (HMA) |
| Filing 21 ENTRY of Appearance by Dedra M. Moore for Defendant Walmart, Inc.. (Moore, Dedra) |
| Filing 20 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Michael Schultz. . (Hoffman, Joseph) |
| Filing 19 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCE: This case is assigned to Track 2. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 5/7/2024. Rule 16 Conference set for 5/14/2024 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Rodney H. Holmes... SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rodney H. Holmes on 04/03/2024. (ANR)
|
| Filing 17 ANSWER to #11 Amended Complaint by Walmart, Inc..(Rahoy, John) |
|
Filing 16
Docket Text ORDER: Re #6 MOTION to Strike Paragraphs 5, 11 and 12 of Plaintiff's Petition by filed Defendant Walmart Inc.; ORDERED DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rodney H. Holmes on 4/2/2024. (HMA)
|
|
Filing 15
Docket Text ORDER: Re #10 MOTION for Leave to Amend Complaint filed by Plaintiff Michael Schultz; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rodney H. Holmes on 4/2/2024. (HMA)
|
| Filing 14 FULL CONSENT has been received by Plaintiff Michael Schultz, Defendant Walmart, Inc. (HMA) |
| Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Steven J. Hughes for Plaintiff Michael Schultz. (Hughes, Steven) |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Michael Schultz. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Hoffman, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Walmart, Inc., , filed by Michael Schultz.(Hoffman, Joseph) Modified docket text on 3/28/2024 (CLH). |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Amend Complaint by Plaintiff Michael Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hoffman, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Michael Schultz.(JWD) |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, by Defendant Walmart, Inc.. (Rahoy, John) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #6 MOTION to Strike Paragraphs 5, 11 and 12 of Plaintiff's Petition filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Rahoy, John) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Strike Paragraphs 5, 11 and 12 of Plaintiff's Petition by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Rahoy, John) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Walmart Inc..(Rahoy, John) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Walmart Inc.. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Rahoy, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Walmart Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Rahoy, John) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by John P. Rahoy for Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Rahoy, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County, case number 24SL-CC00604, with receipt number AMOEDC-10517385, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Attachment Petition, #4 Summons Summons to Walmart, #5 Attachment Return of Service)(Rahoy, John) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/27/2024 due to fillable PDF error) (JWD). Modified on 3/27/2024 (JWD). |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Rodney H. Holmes. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
